Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsShe Stoops to Conquer (2008) (TV) More at IMDbPro »
Overview
User Rating:
Director:
Writer:
Oliver Goldsmith (play)
Release Date:
27 January 2008 (UK) more
Plot:
Charles Marlow and George Hastings set out for Liberty Hall, the home of the Hardcastles, whose daughter Kate Marlow being pressured into marrying. On their way, they meet Kate's brother Tony who decides to play a practical joke on them. | add synopsis
User Comments:
Stagey production of a stage classic more (1 total)
Cast
(Credited cast)| Tim Bell | ... | Thomas | |
| Simon Butteriss | ... | Diggory | |
| Judi Daykin | ... | Bridget | |
| Mark Dexter | ... | Charles Marlow | |
| Julian Duffield | ... | Dick Muggins | |
| Jerry Eldridge | ... | Jack Slang | |
| Hannah Field | ... | Pimple | |
| Susannah Fielding | ... | Kate Hardcastle | |
| Holly Gilbert | ... | Constance Neville | |
| Polly Hemingway | |||
| Chris Holderness | ... | Aminadab | |
| Miles Jupp | ... | Tony Lumpkin | |
| Roy Marsden | ... | Sir Charles Marlow | |
| Richard Pryal | ... | Jeremy | |
| Jack Randall | ... | Tom Twist | |
| Ian Redford | ... | Mr Hardcastle | |
| Jez Smith | ... | Roger | |
| Joseph Thompson | ... | George Hastings |
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
140 min | 140 min (5 parts)
Country:
Language:
Color:
Aspect Ratio:
1.85 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Filming Locations:
Company:
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
Shot in 16 days. more
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (1 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for She Stoops to Conquer (2008) (TV)Recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| The Importance of Being Earnest | Rain or Shine | Henry V | Roxanne | As You Like It |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Comedy section | IMDb UK section | Add this title to MyMovies |

What a very odd production this is. When I watched the first few episodes, with it's cheap look, hammy acting and strange mid-scene episode breaks, I assumed that it had been made in the 70's or early 80's, and that the production date and website details at the end indicated that it had been updated in some way and was being used by it's production company to appear culturally aware. It was only on checking on IMDb that I realised that it was made recently. The sins of the past can be forgiven, or at least viewed with a modicum of condescending indulgence; the sins of today are less likely to be pardoned.
On a positive note, the script is witty enough even if the plot is implausible. The sung recapitulations of the plot at the beginning of the episodes are greatly welcome and must be considered this series' greatest success. The younger members of the cast look well enough. (I am really scraping the bottom of the barrel now.)
Unfortunately there is much to dislike here. The acting is mostly overdone (suitable for the theatre when you have to reach the back row, but not for the intimacy of home viewing) and often worse than that. The actor's asides are poorly managed, spoken so loudly and obviously that I marvel that the other characters don't respond. The camera work is flat, unimaginative and uninteresting. Perhaps this production would have been better filmed "live" in a theatre than on location.
Recommended only for those who wish to see a classic performed for their own educational benefit rather than pleasure.