IMDb >
War of the Worlds (2005) (V)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at Blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsWar of the Worlds (2005) (V) More at IMDbPro »
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
28 June 2005 (USA) moreTagline:
The Invasion Has Already Begun.Plot:
In this modern retelling of H.G. Wells' sci-fi classic, civilization is laid to ruin when a race of super aliens invades Earth. full summary | add synopsisUser Comments:
A well made small budget film, sadly confused with another... more (88 total)Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| C. Thomas Howell | ... | George Herbert | |
| Rhett Giles | ... | Pastor Victor | |
| Andrew Lauer | ... | Sgt. Kerry Williams (as Andy Lauer) | |
| Tinarie Van Wyk-Loots | ... | Felicity Herbert | |
| Jake Busey | ... | Lt. Samuelson (as William Busey) | |
| Dashiell Howell | ... | Alex Herbert (as Dash Howell) | |
| Peter Greene | ... | Matt Herbert | |
| Kim Little | ... | Rebecca | |
| Edward DeRuiter | ... | Max (as Ed Deruiter) | |
| Meredith Laine | ... | Audrey | |
| Matthew Jaeger | ... | Jared | |
| Cayman Mitchell | ... | Jake | |
| Luis de Amechazurra | ... | Bill | |
| Gary Robbins | ... | Jules | |
| Bernadette Perez | ... | Elaine |
Additional Details
Also Known As:
H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds (USA) (complete title)Invasion (UK) (cable TV title)
more
Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsRuntime:
93 minCountry:
USALanguage:
EnglishColor:
ColorAspect Ratio:
1.78 : 1 moreSound Mix:
Dolby DigitalCertification:
USA:RFun Stuff
Goofs:
Factual errors: George Herbert uses a rabies serum to knock out the aliens. He says something to the effect that life defeats life. However rabies vaccinations use dead virus cells to generate immunity. Serum labeled "live" contains genetically modified components but does not actually contain intact live virus. moreFAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (88 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for War of the Worlds (2005) (V) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| The War of the Worlds | Earth vs. the Flying Saucers | Invaders from Mars | Mars Attacks! | The War of the Worlds |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Sci-Fi section | IMDb USA section | Add this title to MyMovies |

As a filmmaker myself, I was very interested to see the David Latt version of War of the Worlds. With the over hyped over Americanized Spielberg/Cruise version of this British tail, and the much mauled Victorian offering of Hines, I was keen to see something that was watchable and story driven, and not over the top with CGI. Whilst the Latt film has its faults, I would say this is perhaps one of (if not THE) best independently produced sci-fi films I have seen for a long time. The film clearly has budget constraints, however, they have made an effort to give us a decent offering. Its shot on film, an expensive undertaking in a market that today widely believes that consumers don't know the difference and won't care. It has some recognisable name actors, all of whom do a great job. In particular, mention should be make of C Thomas Howell, who's experience and skill is evident from the very first line. But most importantly, those making the film (including the actors) obviously cared enough to do a good job, no matter how limited the budget. I like to think that it's not the size of your budget, but what you do with it that counts.
The script won't win any awards, but it is a perfectly functional piece of work capable of supporting a film. It gives the old story War of the Worlds story a slightly different spin. The cinematography ranges from "weekly TV series" quality in some scenes (functional, but nothing exciting), to very good in others. Cinematography can make or break a film, just as acting can. Fortunately for this film, the camera department was clearly competent.
On the boards of IMDb, the film has constantly been confused with the Timothy Hines version http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0425638/combined which has received many negative comments. A shame, because this invariably will have lead to votes being miscast against the Latt version. To make it plain: the Hines version is shot on video and is set in Victorian England. The Latt version (this version) is shot on film, and is set in modern times in the US.
This film doesn't have the CGI whiz bang effects of the Spielberg version. However, effects do not play a major role in the script. I for one applaud anyone who tries to return to good old fashion story telling, without relying on CGI to "wow em senseless". But, if you like to see shots of the aliens and their machines all the time, and aren't particularly interested in story and character development, then perhaps this film is not for you. But if you're more interested to see what happens when story and acting are what keeps your film going, then this one might be worth a look.
In giving the film a score of 7 out of 10, I took into consideration the obvious low budget of the film, verses the result. It has its flaws, and isn't as tight as it could be, but none the less for the market, it's a very good effort.