IMDb >
Breach (2007)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at Blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsBreach (2007) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 33 | slideshow) | Videos (see all 25 NEW) |
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
16 February 2007 (USA) moreTagline:
Inspired by the true story of the greatest security breach in U.S. history morePlot:
Based on the true story, FBI upstart Eric O'Neill enters into a power game with his boss, Robert Hanssen, an agent who was ultimately convicted of selling secrets to the Soviet Union. full summary | full synopsisAwards:
1 nomination moreNewsDesk:
(60 articles)
Billy Ray Signs On For Gears of War (From Screen Rant. 23 October 2009, 9:35 PM, PDT)
Buzz Break: A-Team Comes Together
(From Movieline. 23 October 2009, 1:00 PM, PDT)
User Comments:
Two Men in a Boat more (183 total)Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Chris Cooper | ... | Robert Hanssen | |
| Ryan Phillippe | ... | Eric O'Neill | |
| Laura Linney | ... | Kate Burroughs | |
| Caroline Dhavernas | ... | Juliana O'Neill | |
| Gary Cole | ... | Rich Garces | |
| Dennis Haysbert | ... | Dean Plesac | |
| Kathleen Quinlan | ... | Bonnie Hanssen | |
| Bruce Davison | ... | John O'Neill | |
| Jonathan Watton | ... | Geddes | |
| Tom Barnett | ... | Jim Olsen | |
| Jonathan Potts | ... | D.I.A. Suit | |
| David Huband | ... | Photographer | |
| Catherine Burdon | ... | Agent Nece | |
| Scott Gibson | ... | Agent Sherin | |
| Courtenay J. Stevens | ... | Agent Loper (as Courtenay Stevens) |
Additional Details
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 for violence, sexual content and language.Parents Guide:
View content advisory for parentsRuntime:
110 minCountry:
USALanguage:
EnglishColor:
Color (Technicolor)Aspect Ratio:
1.85 : 1 moreCertification:
Canada:G (Quebec) | USA:PG-13 (certificate #43010) | Finland:K-11 | Australia:M | Singapore:NC-16 | Norway:11 | Sweden:7 | Ireland:12A | UK:12A | Portugal:M/12 | Denmark:7 | Canada:PG (Alberta/British Columbia/Manitoba/Nova Scotia/Ontario) | Brazil:12 | South Korea:15 | Germany:12 | France:Unrated | New Zealand:MFun Stuff
Trivia:
In the hallway, we constantly see a poster with names and pictures of spies that have been caught, as well as short narratives of what their crimes were and how much time they're serving. These posters really exist in secure government facilities, and prominently displayed on all of them, since the events of this movie took place, is a photo of Robert Hanssen. moreGoofs:
Factual errors: When Hanssen is instructing Garces on what's required for the new system, he requests an "OC-48 (connection) with a data rate of 2.488megabits (per second)". An OC-48 connection, in-fact, has capacity for 2488 megabits per second. In addition, anybody in the IT field would never refer to it this way: they would state something along the lines of, "Two and a half gigabits per second" not "Two point four eight eight" moreQuotes:
Eric O'Neill: Is it worth it? Being an agent.Kate Burroughs: Ask me when we've caught him.
more
Soundtrack:
Near You moreFAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (183 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Breach (2007) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Longford | The Assassination of Richard Nixon | The Departed | Antitrust | Zodiac |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Crime section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |
















I was surprised at how effective this was. You know from the very beginning how it will end. You know because it is a true story that there will be no trendy plot twists. You expect, and find, that the young assistant is built around a cliché, as is Hanssen's Catholicism, which oddly ignores the role of Opus Dei in this venture, and focuses on prayer instead of devotion.
And there is a formulaic bit about damaging fathers and odd wives. More: there's the project command center that is drawn from movies and not from life. And finally, our hero is told the FBI's biggest secret in an open public place. This would never ever happen, and it is staged this way only to help the pacing of the thing in terms of stagecraft. And that DIA computer room, with the nice clean Cray-like machines, is from the same fantasy world as "Red October's" neon-lighted missile tubes.
But in spite of all this, it works. And especially compared to "The Departed," it works, simply, cleanly, deeply.
That's because the filmmaker decided early in the game that he was going to do what the Hong Kong "Infernal Affairs" did well and others copied: this business of actors playing characters who are actors. In this case, we have two such in the same boat.
We have a top information manager at the FBI working for the Russians and acting normal, even when leading the hunt for himself. We have the young under cover guy pretending to be simply a clerk. Each intuits the other is watching. The older man completely wins at the start, with the younger man eventually besting him in artifice. Its a calculation that the filmmaker makes, when deciding not to tell us why our young hero does what he does and where he gets the tools. In an ordinary story, that would hurt, but here it is a wise decision because such "explaining" would get in the way of the economy of the thing. And it is all about economic connection with us.
Its a bit counterintuitive that effective stories sometimes get better by lopping off story elements and information. But it is true. Some students of the Hanssen case believe that Hanssen's primary motive was to show his own importance (as a information security planner) by revealing holes in the system that he would have plugged. I wish this film would have worked with that a bit, because this notion of helping the system by hurting is system is both what the story could have been about and the means used to tell the story.
Still, a good one.
As a historical note, there's a reason folks from the FBI and CIA, even senior ones, can't wander into NSA computing facilities. Hanssen wasn't allowed, probably a good thing at the time. Opus Dei again.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.