14 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :- Doesn't live up to it's title., 27 November 2004
Author:
Chuck Straub from Mansfield, CT USA
I just watched National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation 2 on DVD, hoping
to see something at least close to the original, great holiday comedy,
'Christmas Vacation'. I saw nothing of the kind. You can tell right
from the start that this movie just wasn't going to measure up. It's
too bad it has a title that links it to the original Christmas
Vacation. It's really kind of sad. The film can't stand on it's own
merits. I think too many people will view this film on the strength of
the title and it does not come close to that level of comedy. Other
than the title, there is very little connecting the movie to the
original 'Christmas Vacation' and even less of a connection to
Christmas at all. The comedy is very simplistic and the plot poor.
Children might find some humor here but most adults would only get a
chuckle here and there. This movie is a flop. Don't waste your time
with it.
18 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :- Oh My God!!!, 24 December 2003
Author:
Jay McGuire (jaymcguire@adelphia.net) from Colorado Springs, Co
Why oh why did they have to try and make a sequel to one of the greatest
Christmas movies of all time. The movie is a train wreck on every level
and
should have never been made. Randy Quaid's portrayal of cousin Eddie is
an
over the top caricature of his previous outings as cousin Eddie. Also,
the
Eddie character is not interesting enough to carry an entire movie. Even
"eye candy" Sung Hi Lee could not redeem this hunk of holiday crap.
Please
do not waste your time on this move, just watch the original
again.
14 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :- Vomitous, 4 April 2004
Author:
Pat McCurry (acehighpat@aol.com) from Wilton, NH
I am a fan of a few of the Vacation films, but when a movie franchise goes
from the big screen to the TV screen, you know it's out of steam. Made for
TV National Lampoon films do not do well on TV. This movie is another
reason.
I think a lot of us were excited when this was coming out, but we also had
to face the reality...it's a TV movie. Randy Quaid is fine as Cousin Eddie,
but is better in a supporting role than the lead. Dana Barron sets history
as the first actor to reprise her role as one of the Griswold kids. She is
just as pretty, but it doesn't help a thin script.
Why was this movie even made? It was probably because NBC recently picked up
another few years of presenting X-mas Vacation. There is nothing wrong with
the acting. It's all in the script. It's just not that funny. People need to
think before they write stuff like this. It is one Christmas movie I do not
recommend.
12 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :- Hall Of Shame!!!!, 22 December 2003
Author:
(missygoldstein@aol.com) from New York, NY
This movie was a disaster. Why do movie producers insist on
tarnishing the name of something that was truly great? They did
not HAVE to use the "vacation" name to make a story out of this
piece of crap, but that is the ONLY way anyone would have EVER
watched I suppose. First off, what is Vacation without Chevy
Chase? He WAS the movie. The original vacation was hilarious
and I still laugh when I see it. The second was not as good, but
still pretty decent. The Christmas one,....hmmmm, not crazy about,
but not horrid. This one basically found the long lost Audrey and
put her together with her trailer trash cousins, which if you had
seen the first movie know would NEVER happen. So it was her,
cousin eddie, and his wife and the grandfather, played by Ed
Asner. All these characters were morally depraved, and just
disgusting all together. The story was rediculous and not the least
bit funny, but really sad.
They did the same thing to such greats as "Jaws", "Crocodile
Dundee", "Superman" and so many others. They milked these
stories for all they were worth. They took the original piece of work
and dragged it through the mud!!!! Why? So Sad!
8 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :- Horrendous Waste of Time...I was Embarrased, 31 December 2003
Author:
Paul Papsmear (aunt_ednas_tent@yahoo.com) from Philly PA
I sat through all 2 hours. I do not know what was worse, the awful plot,
the
lame characters or the hawaiian hottie that Eddie's 11 yearold kid and 80
year old grandpa made sexual advances toward. The money spent on this was
just flushed down the throne. Matty Simmons should be ashamed. The
original
idea for this movie was "A Swiss Family Griswold" and it somehow turned
into
this mess. The only bright spot is that it's ratings were so bad we will
never see this on TV again. AVOID AT ALL COSTS...RENT ERNEST SAVES XMAS or
something else.
8 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :- uhm?, 5 January 2004
Author:
srbestafka from United States
I knew this would be one of the worst movies I could have imagined...but
in
just 20 short minutes it actually exceeded my low expections by being
possibly THE worst movie I have ever seen.
I have already wasted too much time typing about it...trust me, it
sucks.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- Cousin Eddie possessed, 26 November 2004
Author:
rrorlo from Salem or
I loved the original, I watch it every year. but the second is a piece
of garbage and it never should have been made. The second could have
worked if there was a different location. The son was not an original
or didn't even act like one of Eddie's kids. Third was too smart for
Eddie which downplayed his father role. None of the other kids where in
it. It just could of been a lot better. I don't know why they even
tried to make this movie. There was no continuncy from the first movie.
I will pretend that this one doesn't even exist. It is sad that the
actors didn't even see that they where made fools of. A really bad
movie. I just think that i wasted an hour or more on a bad movie and i
really love all of the national lampoon films.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- If I could choose zero stars I would have., 20 January 2006
Author:
cully16 from United States
I'm a big fan of the "Vacation" franchise, and I love Randy Quaid as
Cousin Eddie, and at least a couple of the behind-the-scenes names were
involved in this project (most notably Matty Simmons, who produced or
executive-produced all 4 of the theatrical releases, as well as "Animal
House"). For those reasons I figured this made-for-TV spin off might be
worth checking out, even without Chevy Chase.
For the record, I did not expect it to be very good; I just thought it
might be a slightly amusing diversion. Therefore, my high level of
disappointment goes to prove just how bad this utter turd of a movie
really was. It was mind-numbingly, jaw-droppingly, heart-stoppingly,
head-explodingly terrible. Yet, somehow, I could not stop watching it.
It's a sickness I have; I can't seem to walk out on a film or give up
on a TV show before it ends. Nothing has ever made me want two hours of
my life back more than this movie.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- All I want for Christmas is for them to stop making these awful "Vacation" movies ..., 22 December 2003
Author:
Zbigniew_Krycsiwiki from United States
I watched about the first 30 - 40 minutes of this movie on television the
other night and can agree that this is by far the worst of the series. Not
any of it is funny, even Randy Quaid can't save this mess. Eric Idle
wasn't
funny in N.L. Euro. Vacation, and he's even worse here. The only funny
scene
is where they're at the airport and some guy dressed as Santa walks by the
camera yelling "Did anybody lose this?" as he holds up a prosthetic leg...
1/2 a star out of ****
5 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- Good reason why I usually don't watch TV Movies, 24 December 2003
Author:
TC-4 (markviilin@aol.com) from Pepperell, Ma
I was hoping that this would be funny, boy was I wrong! Any Gilligan's
Island would have been funnier. Not only was it boring but the quantity
of
commercials was absurd. I was glad when it was over.
Looks like I resume going to the video store soon.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglinestrailers and videospostersphoto galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Christmas Vacation 2: Cousin Eddie's Island Adventure (2003) (TV)
14 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :-

Doesn't live up to it's title., 27 November 2004
Author: Chuck Straub from Mansfield, CT USA
I just watched National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation 2 on DVD, hoping to see something at least close to the original, great holiday comedy, 'Christmas Vacation'. I saw nothing of the kind. You can tell right from the start that this movie just wasn't going to measure up. It's too bad it has a title that links it to the original Christmas Vacation. It's really kind of sad. The film can't stand on it's own merits. I think too many people will view this film on the strength of the title and it does not come close to that level of comedy. Other than the title, there is very little connecting the movie to the original 'Christmas Vacation' and even less of a connection to Christmas at all. The comedy is very simplistic and the plot poor. Children might find some humor here but most adults would only get a chuckle here and there. This movie is a flop. Don't waste your time with it.
18 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :-

Oh My God!!!, 24 December 2003
Author: Jay McGuire (jaymcguire@adelphia.net) from Colorado Springs, Co
Why oh why did they have to try and make a sequel to one of the greatest Christmas movies of all time. The movie is a train wreck on every level and should have never been made. Randy Quaid's portrayal of cousin Eddie is an over the top caricature of his previous outings as cousin Eddie. Also, the Eddie character is not interesting enough to carry an entire movie. Even "eye candy" Sung Hi Lee could not redeem this hunk of holiday crap. Please do not waste your time on this move, just watch the original again.
14 out of 15 people found the following comment useful :-

Vomitous, 4 April 2004
Author: Pat McCurry (acehighpat@aol.com) from Wilton, NH
I am a fan of a few of the Vacation films, but when a movie franchise goes from the big screen to the TV screen, you know it's out of steam. Made for TV National Lampoon films do not do well on TV. This movie is another reason.
I think a lot of us were excited when this was coming out, but we also had to face the reality...it's a TV movie. Randy Quaid is fine as Cousin Eddie, but is better in a supporting role than the lead. Dana Barron sets history as the first actor to reprise her role as one of the Griswold kids. She is just as pretty, but it doesn't help a thin script.
Why was this movie even made? It was probably because NBC recently picked up another few years of presenting X-mas Vacation. There is nothing wrong with the acting. It's all in the script. It's just not that funny. People need to think before they write stuff like this. It is one Christmas movie I do not recommend.
12 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :-
Hall Of Shame!!!!, 22 December 2003
Author: (missygoldstein@aol.com) from New York, NY
This movie was a disaster. Why do movie producers insist on tarnishing the name of something that was truly great? They did not HAVE to use the "vacation" name to make a story out of this piece of crap, but that is the ONLY way anyone would have EVER watched I suppose. First off, what is Vacation without Chevy Chase? He WAS the movie. The original vacation was hilarious and I still laugh when I see it. The second was not as good, but still pretty decent. The Christmas one,....hmmmm, not crazy about, but not horrid. This one basically found the long lost Audrey and put her together with her trailer trash cousins, which if you had seen the first movie know would NEVER happen. So it was her, cousin eddie, and his wife and the grandfather, played by Ed Asner. All these characters were morally depraved, and just disgusting all together. The story was rediculous and not the least bit funny, but really sad.
They did the same thing to such greats as "Jaws", "Crocodile Dundee", "Superman" and so many others. They milked these stories for all they were worth. They took the original piece of work and dragged it through the mud!!!! Why? So Sad!
8 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-

Horrendous Waste of Time...I was Embarrased, 31 December 2003
Author: Paul Papsmear (aunt_ednas_tent@yahoo.com) from Philly PA
I sat through all 2 hours. I do not know what was worse, the awful plot, the lame characters or the hawaiian hottie that Eddie's 11 yearold kid and 80 year old grandpa made sexual advances toward. The money spent on this was just flushed down the throne. Matty Simmons should be ashamed. The original idea for this movie was "A Swiss Family Griswold" and it somehow turned into this mess. The only bright spot is that it's ratings were so bad we will never see this on TV again. AVOID AT ALL COSTS...RENT ERNEST SAVES XMAS or something else.
8 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :-

uhm?, 5 January 2004
Author: srbestafka from United States
I knew this would be one of the worst movies I could have imagined...but in just 20 short minutes it actually exceeded my low expections by being possibly THE worst movie I have ever seen.
I have already wasted too much time typing about it...trust me, it sucks.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

Cousin Eddie possessed, 26 November 2004
Author: rrorlo from Salem or
I loved the original, I watch it every year. but the second is a piece of garbage and it never should have been made. The second could have worked if there was a different location. The son was not an original or didn't even act like one of Eddie's kids. Third was too smart for Eddie which downplayed his father role. None of the other kids where in it. It just could of been a lot better. I don't know why they even tried to make this movie. There was no continuncy from the first movie. I will pretend that this one doesn't even exist. It is sad that the actors didn't even see that they where made fools of. A really bad movie. I just think that i wasted an hour or more on a bad movie and i really love all of the national lampoon films.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

If I could choose zero stars I would have., 20 January 2006
Author: cully16 from United States
I'm a big fan of the "Vacation" franchise, and I love Randy Quaid as Cousin Eddie, and at least a couple of the behind-the-scenes names were involved in this project (most notably Matty Simmons, who produced or executive-produced all 4 of the theatrical releases, as well as "Animal House"). For those reasons I figured this made-for-TV spin off might be worth checking out, even without Chevy Chase.
For the record, I did not expect it to be very good; I just thought it might be a slightly amusing diversion. Therefore, my high level of disappointment goes to prove just how bad this utter turd of a movie really was. It was mind-numbingly, jaw-droppingly, heart-stoppingly, head-explodingly terrible. Yet, somehow, I could not stop watching it. It's a sickness I have; I can't seem to walk out on a film or give up on a TV show before it ends. Nothing has ever made me want two hours of my life back more than this movie.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

All I want for Christmas is for them to stop making these awful "Vacation" movies ..., 22 December 2003
Author: Zbigniew_Krycsiwiki from United States
I watched about the first 30 - 40 minutes of this movie on television the other night and can agree that this is by far the worst of the series. Not any of it is funny, even Randy Quaid can't save this mess. Eric Idle wasn't funny in N.L. Euro. Vacation, and he's even worse here. The only funny scene is where they're at the airport and some guy dressed as Santa walks by the camera yelling "Did anybody lose this?" as he holds up a prosthetic leg...
1/2 a star out of ****
5 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-
Good reason why I usually don't watch TV Movies, 24 December 2003
Author: TC-4 (markviilin@aol.com) from Pepperell, Ma
I was hoping that this would be funny, boy was I wrong! Any Gilligan's Island would have been funnier. Not only was it boring but the quantity of commercials was absurd. I was glad when it was over. Looks like I resume going to the video store soon.
Add another comment
Related Links