IMDb >
Bugs (2003) (TV)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsBugs (2003) (TV) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 1 | slideshow) |
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
6 September 2003 (USA) moreTagline:
When Giant Insects Swarm In The City's Subways, Humanity Lands On The Fast Track To Extinction!User Comments:
Pure Buggery moreCast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Antonio Sabato Jr. | ... | Matt Pollack | |
| Angie Everhart | ... | Emily Foster | |
| R.H. Thomson | ... | Reynolds | |
| Karl Pruner | ... | Victor Petronovich | |
| Duane Murray | ... | Benton | |
| Romano Orzari | ... | Garcia | |
| Stephanie Moore | ... | Manning | |
| Wes Williams | ... | Bergstein (as Wes 'Maestro' Williams) | |
| Xuan Fraser | ... | Beat Cop | |
| Lynne Griffin | ... | Medical Examiner | |
| Tim Post | ... | Jack Ball | |
| Elias Zarou | ... | Chief Lembeck | |
| Nigel Hamer | ... | VIP Man | |
| Nanci Steele | ... | VIP Woman | |
| Peter Kosaka | ... | Mr. Yokoto |
Additional Details
MPAA:
Rated R for creature violence and bloody images.Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsRuntime:
82 min | USA:120 min (including commercials)Language:
EnglishColor:
ColorCertification:
Netherlands:16 | South Korea:15 | USA:Unrated (DVD rating) | USA:R | Australia:MA | Germany:16 | New Zealand:R13 | UK:15FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Bugs (2003) (TV)| Recent Posts (updated daily) | User |
|---|---|
| Why such a low rating? | hughesmonger |
| Finally Got A Rating... | DJBKJmeeker-1 |
Recommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Mimic | Heaven | Terminal Invasion | Deep Core | X-Men |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Sci-Fi section | IMDb Canada section | Add this title to MyMovies |



Hordes of Large, armor-plated scorpion-like insects are unleashed from an underground cavern in yet another nature-gone-berzerk project from the basement of the Sci-Fi channel. The usual motley crew of hapless humans is sent in to deal with them. Despite their impressive firepower, the boys in blue(or black in this case) don't fare well at all. Lots of stereotypical characters are picked off in various grisly ways before this film flips over and dies with all legs kicking. The survivors are predictable.
Actually I liked the scene where the police mount the M60 on the tripod rather than the normal movie technique of firing it one handed Charlie Sheen style.
Plot holes abound. Why would the police send in a team miles underground immediately after the first train disaster without knowing what they are dealing with? Why not send in one of those EOD robots, or rig up some kind of railcar with reinforced armor(or electrified exterior)? Why didn't the work crew that constructed the tunnel in the first place get attacked? What were all these bugs eating underground for millions of years? Why don't the police use chemicals?
What kind of low rent writers are the sci-fi channel employing these days? Who knows.
The character who loses his mind near the end is utterly ridiculous. His performance is too silly for words. The rest of the acting is barely passable, and the effects are decent. Other than that the movie is a failure in terms of story, dialogue, characterization and imagination. There's nothing particularly exciting about this movie - or about almost anything the sci-fi channel has managed to cook up lately. What they ought to do is make 15 minute shorts with nothing but the action scenes. That's apparently all they're good at.