Voyna (2002)

User Rating:

7.3/10   

Director:

Aleksey Balabanov

Writer:

Aleksey Balabanov (writer)

Release Date:

14 March 2002 (Russia)

Genre:

Action | Drama

Tagline:

this is no "Brat-3", this is War

Plot Keywords:

British Tourist | Kidnapping | Rescue | Chechnya | Rebel

Awards:

3 wins & 5 nominations

Cast

Aleksey Chadov	...	Ivan
Ian Kelly	...	John
Ingeborga Dapkunaite	...	Margaret
Sergei Bodrov Jr.	...	Captain Medvedev
Evklid Kyurdzidis	...	Ruslan
Giorgi Gurgulia	...	Aslan
Vladimir Gostyukhin	...	Ivan's Father
Ben Foster
Yuri Stepanov
David McAllister
Andrei Kormunin
Steve Jamieson
Lev Erenburg
Peter Wickham
Stanislav Stotsky		(as Stas Stotsky)

Also Known As:

Война (Russia)
War (International: English title)

Runtime:

120 min

Country:

Russia

Language:

Russian | English | Chechen

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.66 : 1

Sound Mix:

Dolby Digital

Certification:

Australia:MA (TV rating) | USA:R

Filming Locations:

Verkhniy Chegem, Kabardino-Balkaria, Russia

Company:

Kinokompaniya CTB

Best war movie I've seen

This film is both very different and very superior to American war movies. The latter these days are marred by moral equivalence, sanitisation and excessively balletic theatricality, with battle scenes looking like firework displays filmed in slow motion as the orchestra swells to a cheesy crescendo. This film, by contrast, is infused with an industrial-strength dose of Russian cynicism. It's refreshing to see a lack of PC cant in its depiction of a genuinely evil enemy. For once it has a realistic portrayal of the religion of peace, with peace-loving Islamic terrorists peacefully beheading civilians for internet decapitation videos and leaving their victims in a particularly peaceful state. When they're not welshing on deals or slaughtering the infidel, they're settling scores with each other in inter-clan blood feuds. However unlike older American & British war movies which weren't made by leftists, the nominal good guys on the Russian side are incompetent, corrupt and unmotivated. The battle scenes are very realistic, neither sanitised and bloodless, nor baroque self-indulgent slow-motion Peckinpahesque spectacles. They are gory but not overly spectacular or thunderous, heroic in the abstract but sordid. Civilian casualties are inevitable, somewhat regrettable but unavoidable. It's particularly relevant to see the effete, whining, hypocritical Pilgeresque Englishman demanding human rights from those who spit at the concept, anguishing over the deaths of "civilians" travelling with the terrorists, then putting the whole party in danger with his wild shooting.

In refreshing contrast to Hollywood, the acting is excellent and the plot is tight yet unpredictable. The denouement had me laughing out loud for the way it highlights the hypocrisy of everyone in dealing with the reality of war. The cinematography is magnificent, especially in the mountain tops and steep valleys. The jeep being rolled down the steep gorge was a particular highlight.