IMDb >
Teknolust (2002)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsTeknolust (2002) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 17 | slideshow) |
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
24 February 2005 (Israel) morePlot:
Anxious to use artificial life to improve the world, Rosetta Stone, a bio-geneticist creates a Recipe... more | add synopsisAwards:
1 win & 1 nomination moreUser Comments:
Heavily symbolic and metaphorical but not much technology or lust moreCast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Tilda Swinton | ... | Rosetta / Ruby / Marinne / Olive | |
| Jeremy Davies | ... | Sandy | |
| James Urbaniak | ... | Agent Hopper | |
| John O'Keefe | ... | Professor Crick | |
| Karen Black | ... | Dirty Dick | |
| Al Nazemian | ... | Dr. Bea | |
| S.U. Violet | ... | Dr. Aye | |
| Josh Kornbluth | ... | Tim | |
| Thomas Jay Ryan | ... | Preacher | |
| Howard Swain | ... | Alex | |
| Diana Demar | ... | Dana | |
| John Pirruccello | ... | Hair Dresser | |
| Abigail Van Alyn | ... | Sandy's Mom | |
| Dick Bright | ... | Phil | |
| John Bradford King | ... | Nathan (as Brad King) |
Additional Details
MPAA:
Rated R for some sexual content.Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsRuntime:
85 min | Canada:81 minLanguage:
EnglishColor:
ColorAspect Ratio:
1.78 : 1 moreSound Mix:
StereoFilming Locations:
San Francisco, California, USAFun Stuff
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Teknolust (2002)| Recent Posts (updated daily) | User |
|---|---|
| So is this film dead or what? | RichFife |
| Omigosh... | Unreal City |
| his next film | solarbeef |
Recommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Zus & zo | Across the Universe | Knocked Up | The 40 Year Old Virgin | Notes on a Scandal |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Sci-Fi section | IMDb USA section | Add this title to MyMovies |












Don't be fooled by the provocative title and the R-rating, this film has only implied sex and only the briefest nudity. Rather, it is a thought-provoking but odd piece of work that delves into the meaning of relationships between men and women, the need to experience life's pain along with pleasures, and the different roles that we play to survive in society. The film is about a scientist who creates three computer generated/robotic duplicates of her own self. The duplicates exist in a virtual reality "safe" from the harm that the real world can levy on them. As the film progresses, we see through the interactions with the main character that they have become her alter egos. Trouble brews when they start to become self-aware and want more freedom. As I watched the film I was surprised by the apparent low budget it was made with but how it outshines most big-budget Hollywood blockbusters in its depth and scope. The acting is OK but amateurish, with occasional bad timing and wooden responses. The dialogue seems to get a little too long and pretentious at times and you have to be very attentive to catch the double entendres and metaphors in order to keep up with the script. Despite all this, it was a very good movie that proves that there is under-appreciated talent out there that Hollywood refuses to acknowledge. People that liked films like Slaughterhouse-5, Orlando, or the Handmaid's Tale would be advised to give this film a try.