IMDb >
Shadowlands (1993)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at Blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsShadowlands (1993) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 21 | slideshow) | Videos (see all 2) |
Overview
User Rating:
Director:
Writers:
Release Date:
14 January 1994 (USA)
more
Tagline:
Based on a true story. more
Plot:
C.S. Lewis, a world-renowned writer and professor, leads a passionless life until he meets spirited poet Joy Gresham. full summary | full synopsis
Awards:
Nominated for 2 Oscars.
Another 7 wins
&
6 nominations
more
NewsDesk:
(7 articles)
Birthday Suits: The Blonde and the Bookish
(From FilmExperience. 29 November 2009, 4:00 AM, PST)
6 Actors That Should Probably Not Watch Their Own Movies
(From FilmSchoolRejects. 23 November 2009, 7:16 PM, PST)
(From FilmExperience. 29 November 2009, 4:00 AM, PST)
6 Actors That Should Probably Not Watch Their Own Movies
(From FilmSchoolRejects. 23 November 2009, 7:16 PM, PST)
User Comments:
What Shadowlands does, it does very well.
more (74 total)
Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Julian Fellowes | ... | Desmond Arding | |
| Roddy Maude-Roxby | ... | Arnold Dopliss | |
| Michael Denison | ... | Harry Harrington | |
| Andrew Seear | ... | Bob Chafer | |
| Tim McMullan | ... | Nick Farrell | |
| John Wood | ... | Christopher Riley | |
| Andrew Hawkins | ... | Rupert Parrish | |
| Peter Howell | ... | College President | |
| Anthony Hopkins | ... | Jack Lewis | |
| Edward Hardwicke | ... | Warnie Lewis | |
| Robert Flemyng | ... | Claude Bird | |
| James Frain | ... | Peter Whistler | |
| Toby Whithouse | ... | Frith | |
| Daniel Goode | ... | Lieven | |
| Scott Handy | ... | Standish |
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
131 min | Canada:115 min (Ontario)
Country:
Language:
Color:
Color (Eastmancolor)
Aspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Certification:
Iceland:L |
Ireland:G |
South Korea:12 |
Philippines:G |
Argentina:13 |
Chile:14 |
Finland:K-8 |
Spain:T |
Sweden:7 |
UK:U |
USA:PG (#32508) |
Singapore:PG |
Australia:PG |
Germany:12
Filming Locations:
Company:
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
Joy Gresham's husband was William Lindsay Gresham, an author whose best known work was made into a film with Tyrone Power, Nightmare Alley (1947).
more
Goofs:
Errors in geography: Both the picture of the Golden Valley hanging in Jack's study, and the actual vista Jack and Joy find on their honeymoon are in fact the view of the Wye Valley from Symonds Yat - as the woman in the hotel says, the Golden Valley is that of the River Dore.
more
Quotes:
Harry:
Christopher can scoff, Jack, but I know how hard you've been praying; and now God is answering your prayers.
C. S. Lewis: That's not why I pray, Harry. I pray because I can't help myself. I pray because I'm helpless. I pray because the need flows out of me all the time, waking and sleeping. It doesn't change God, it changes me.
more
C. S. Lewis: That's not why I pray, Harry. I pray because I can't help myself. I pray because I'm helpless. I pray because the need flows out of me all the time, waking and sleeping. It doesn't change God, it changes me.
more
Movie Connections:
Referenced in "BBC Proms: Prom 2: Music from Great British Films (#1.7)" (2007)
more
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (74 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Shadowlands (1993) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Terms of Endearment | Gone with the Wind | Les invasions barbares | The Living and the Dead | Stevie |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Biography section | IMDb UK section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |




Many people seeing this film who are familiar with CS Lewis' writings will be tempted to be disappointed.
They should not be. In defense of this film and the method used to get the results, I have two things to say.
The first, and by far the most important, is that spiritual films are very difficult to make -- especially if one is speaking about something above one's head. That's why the life of Jesus is such a difficult subject and has met with so little success, at least from an artistic point of view.
Even Mel Gibson's Passion suffers from this to some extent. I would say his representation of the Passion reflect more of our times and what we consider to be important than on the ministry of Jesus. I may be wrong; I am not a believer so my opinion may not matter. But what is true is that no matter what your belief, spiritual man (Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha and others) are very hard to make biographies of. In my opinion what they represented survived not because we have understanding, but because our instincts tell us they are what we should be. It is not a mind thing at all. AND FILMS REQUIRE OUR MINDS, at least to make them. It would take a soul equal to that of Christ to make a film about Christ.
To a far lesser extent, that is true of CS Lewis. His was a very complex theology dressed in wonderful parables. He had a great understanding of the parables and used the same technique. It does little good to discuss his theology in a film that is about 2 hours long. In fact, the viewer is sort of expected to know something about his writings and theology.
Which brings me to my second point. Perhaps it is because I am over 60 and not been brought up on Romances that I find this one so appealing. Here was a man that had lived his entire life one way, mostly in his mind, when he was confronted with feelings that demanded he reinterpret everything he believed. How many of us at his age could do what CS Lewis did?
Here was a man that thought one way and was forced to live another. What the mind is a very poor substitute for what our emotions understand. CS Lewis was very quick, I think, to recognize this and embraced it completely once he found it out.
Douglas Davidman Gresham (Joy Gresham's son), has said that the film is perhaps not completely factually correct, but the emotion representation is "spot on".
For me, no truer words could be spoken. What does it matter what details are missing, or changed because we have only 2 hours to tell a story? What matters is that we see the humanity of the man and his wonderful ability to embrace openly his new found emotions are what matters. And to put this into his spiritual structure was even more remarkable.
It's a good film. Enjoy it and pay attention. It requires an open heart and an open mind. Give it both.