6 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :- nightmares within nightmares intruding into real life; pretty good experimentalish low-budgeter, 16 January 2005
Author:
CryFi from Lansingburgh, New York, USA
I found this to be pretty enjoyable. I could see how people might be
frustrated by the uneven monster and gore effects. Sometimes they're
pretty good, and sometimes (particularly when they show too much)
they're pretty cheesy. Given how much of the movie is composed of
nightmares, or nightmares intruding into reality, the way things look
can be blamed on the dreams.
The story isn't clear from the start, since the movie starts off with a
dream within a dream (or maybe even a layer or two beyond that). It
becomes clear that the main character, Ben Dobbs, is a college student
who after years of not remembering his dreams, is now having a series
of nightmares. Each one picks up where the previous left off, more or
less. He finds that when he tells people about his dreams, they start
seeing them too, even when they're awake.
There's one dream sequence involving someone going into a basement, and
finding a figure facing the wall in a corner, and then the camera
retreating in a shaky hand-held fashion that I wonder if it influenced
a certain other movie....
The video box claimed the movie was inspired by H.P. Lovecraft (though
not based on anything by him specifically). I can sort of see that,
with some of the stories of his that deal with dreams, and also his
poetry. There's a poem recited in the movie from which the title comes.
I liked it and I'd be curious the see the DVD which may be coming out
this year.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- Quintessential 80s Horror, 3 July 2006
Author:
cdicocco from United States
Hopefully Jay will get this film re-released. I personally very much
enjoy it. It has a certain quality that most modern horror films do not
have--the ability to watch it more than once or twice and still have it
perk your interest. A film doesn't have to have dazzling modern special
effects or top Hollywood actors in it to be good. What I look for in a
film is an interesting story and an overall enjoyable viewing
experience. This film certainly meets that criteria. I came across this
film in an independent video store that (sadly) has closed down a few
years ago because they were bought out by a large chain. Support your
local independent video stores and support independent film!
5 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- Proof that you don't need millions to make a decent film., 22 October 2005
Author:
teptime from fabulous Las Vega$!
I love seeing low-budget and NO-budget films rise above their
limitations and succeed in becoming something greater that merely
watchable. "BEYOND DREAM'S DOOR" is such a film, one that presents an
intelligent and engaging story with enough resourcefulness and
creativity to make the shortcomings of a meager budget far less
obvious. Sure, some of the special effects are on the hokey side(but
wonderfully gross!), and the acting is fairly amateur...but don't let
forgivable flaws hold you back from enjoying this wild, surreal tale of
a young man being relentlessly tormented by his nightmares, both in
sleep and awake. Things are far more complex within the story, but
let's save good surprises for viewing time.
Seven out of ten stars...I'm not boiling over with the enthusiasm of
other reviewers here, but I was more than pleasantly surprised with
this film...and that's for damn sure, Maynard.
5 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- An important film, ahead of its time , 5 December 2004
Author:
JamesLisk (james.lisk@sympatico.ca) from Belleville, Ontario, Canada
Beyond Dreams Door was essentially the most important film in my young
movie-watching life, and for good reason, as it represents everything a
film should be - dynamic, experimental and most importantly,
intelligent. It also yielded the notion, at least to me, that
low-budget independent cinema was where the true passionate visionaries
existed, people like Jay Woelfel.
Utilizing elements from popular culture and new wave French cinema and
working with a limited budget and a mostly in experienced cast and
crew, Jay Woelfel managed to craft a stylish cerebral film that dares
to takes chances like few films before it were willing to do.
Bypassing the conventional formula exercised in most other horror
films, Woelfel chooses to operate in a non-linear format (remember,
this pre-dated Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs by a few years) while
also utilizing Hitchcock's various laws of systematization,
specifically the use of colors, and the lighting schemes of the various
characters. Add to this various other subtle factors that fail to
stand-out during the initial viewings, but become quite prominent the
more the film is examined, and, in the end, what you are left with is
an important film, that is essentially way way ahead of its time.
The movie concerns a shy Ohio Psychology student Benjamin Dobbs, played
by Nick Baldasare, who finds himself plagued by a series of horrific
inter-connecting nightmares, after he unknowingly agrees to be apart of
a dream research experiment. Ben's initial sense that the dreams might
have something to do with the untimely loss of his parents quickly
fades as they become increasingly stranger and more terrifying. Unable
to cope, Ben seeks help in the form of the various on-campus teachers.
His psychology professor Dr. Noxx, played Norm Singer, is his first
obvious choice, and Noxx easily embraces Ben's pleas for help as
something real. After looking into it, the two come upon a notation in
a book, and a case history of another man named D.F. White, that seems
to point definitively to the existence of the very things Ben has been
dreaming about. Ben quickly discovers the 'things' in the dream realm
aren't happy with the sudden Earthbound knowledge of their reality, and
quickly take it upon themselves to get the evidence back any way they
can. Woelfel makes a point to not render any religious allusions, and
the doorway, and what lies beyond, remains vague enough for the viewers
to decide for themselves what 'the beyond' actually is.
As the film unfolds, we also note that the narrative changes hands,
along with the usage of colorful composition, as Ben passes on
knowledge of his curse to the various people he asks for help. The
second person to get swallowed up in Ben's nightmares is a teaching
assistant Eric Baxter, played by Rick Kesler, who early on is posed a
question by Noxx about what he would do if confronted with a life or
death question -- and through the course of the film, is allowed to
truly answer it. Baxter's initial reasons for helping Ben, and his
later insistence that "It's not my problem" point to a screenplay not
constructed to fit a formula, rather, the real actions of a three
dimensional character. Also aiding Ben on his quest for answers is D.F.
White (Daniel White) who died nearly twenty years earlier, and appears
to him in the form of a ghostly apparition, or guardian angel, as one
friend in college put it. The enigmatic White offers up cryptic words
of advice, while leading Ben through the land of the dead and into the
proverbial "light".
Visually the film is stunning, and the usage of color as a means of
depicting the various character's motivations, is amazing. Personally,
it was the first time I had ever seen it used before in film. Woelfel's
insistence on telling the story in a non-linear format means a lot of
jumping around, back-tracking, and various other things that will make
for fun multiple viewings. Woelfel also avoids spoon-feeding his
audience. Rather than pointing out the obvious, he allows the viewer to
make up their own mind about what they are seeing. In my opinion, the
film is much more effective because of this fact. The musical score,
also composed by Jay Woelfel, is very good as it helps to add some
genuine atmosphere to the film.
A few people have complained that the acting was stiff, but I felt it
fit perfectly with the tone of the film, which is easily one of the
more somber pieces one is likely to see. The special effects were
lacking for the most part, but that doesn't take anything away from the
piece as it becomes abundantly clear that this film is not about the
boogeyman-in-the-closet but rather the psychology behind the
boogeyman-in-the-closet.
Beyond Dreams Door is a cult film that has earned its status. It
garnered much discussion and many long debates from my various friends
in college, each with a differing theory one what, or who, Benjamin
Dobbs is, and what actually lied beyond 'The Beyond'. I personally
believe that Beyond Dreams Door should be mandatory viewing by anyone
with a true interest in film. I highly recommend it.
Low-budget film-making at its absolute best!
Very impressive attempt given the low budget., 18 November 2007
Author:
t-birkhead from United Kingdom
The budget for this one is obviously low, with amateurish acting and
cheap, occasionally silly effects. The acting is the greater issue
though, for the effects are quite endearingly gross in a few places and
also deployed to maximum effect in the service of an excellent, vaguely
Lovecraftian plot line. The plot and writing are the best thing here,
keeping the story gripping and masterfully unfolding the strange
events. Even the low grade acting can't dampen the intrigue that this
movie conjures and there are times, especially during the trippy,
surrealistic dream sequences that the movie is pretty darn cool. Also
Darby Vasbinder is very nice to look at as the dream temptress. The
film comes close to an eight for me, but is taken down by the ending,
which ends up a little generic and tedious, compounded by the effects
showing their budget and the acting not managing to convince. This
stops the film from being fully satisfying, although it is still well
worthwhile for the more adventurous minded horror fan.
2 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :- Darby Vasbinder is Stunning!, 12 June 2003
Author:
spalkin (spalkin@sbcglobal.net) from Worthington, Ohio
A dark, complicated horror flick with the "cultability" of Phantasm! Jay
Woelful's best effort and casting the absolutely beautiful Darby Vasbinder
as the Dream Babe is perfect! She's a dream come true. Done on a
shoestring
budget, this movie is still able to conjur up enough imagination to give
you
night mares, or dreams of Darby Vasbinder!
3 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :- Very very dull film, 30 September 1998
Author:
Clayton from Mt Pleasant, MI
The box promises a lot more than this film delivers, as a large majority of
the film is dull, repetitive, hopelessly cheap dream sequences accomplished
with a fog machine and colored lights. The acting is poor, and it looks like
a handful of college students decided to throw together this schlocky film
on a boring weekend. The overall premise is intriguing, but the film fails
to deliver on its promises.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Beyond Dream's Door (1989)
6 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-

nightmares within nightmares intruding into real life; pretty good experimentalish low-budgeter, 16 January 2005
Author: CryFi from Lansingburgh, New York, USA
I found this to be pretty enjoyable. I could see how people might be frustrated by the uneven monster and gore effects. Sometimes they're pretty good, and sometimes (particularly when they show too much) they're pretty cheesy. Given how much of the movie is composed of nightmares, or nightmares intruding into reality, the way things look can be blamed on the dreams.
The story isn't clear from the start, since the movie starts off with a dream within a dream (or maybe even a layer or two beyond that). It becomes clear that the main character, Ben Dobbs, is a college student who after years of not remembering his dreams, is now having a series of nightmares. Each one picks up where the previous left off, more or less. He finds that when he tells people about his dreams, they start seeing them too, even when they're awake.
There's one dream sequence involving someone going into a basement, and finding a figure facing the wall in a corner, and then the camera retreating in a shaky hand-held fashion that I wonder if it influenced a certain other movie....
The video box claimed the movie was inspired by H.P. Lovecraft (though not based on anything by him specifically). I can sort of see that, with some of the stories of his that deal with dreams, and also his poetry. There's a poem recited in the movie from which the title comes.
I liked it and I'd be curious the see the DVD which may be coming out this year.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

Quintessential 80s Horror, 3 July 2006
Author: cdicocco from United States
Hopefully Jay will get this film re-released. I personally very much enjoy it. It has a certain quality that most modern horror films do not have--the ability to watch it more than once or twice and still have it perk your interest. A film doesn't have to have dazzling modern special effects or top Hollywood actors in it to be good. What I look for in a film is an interesting story and an overall enjoyable viewing experience. This film certainly meets that criteria. I came across this film in an independent video store that (sadly) has closed down a few years ago because they were bought out by a large chain. Support your local independent video stores and support independent film!
5 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-
Proof that you don't need millions to make a decent film., 22 October 2005
Author: teptime from fabulous Las Vega$!
I love seeing low-budget and NO-budget films rise above their limitations and succeed in becoming something greater that merely watchable. "BEYOND DREAM'S DOOR" is such a film, one that presents an intelligent and engaging story with enough resourcefulness and creativity to make the shortcomings of a meager budget far less obvious. Sure, some of the special effects are on the hokey side(but wonderfully gross!), and the acting is fairly amateur...but don't let forgivable flaws hold you back from enjoying this wild, surreal tale of a young man being relentlessly tormented by his nightmares, both in sleep and awake. Things are far more complex within the story, but let's save good surprises for viewing time.
Seven out of ten stars...I'm not boiling over with the enthusiasm of other reviewers here, but I was more than pleasantly surprised with this film...and that's for damn sure, Maynard.
5 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-

An important film, ahead of its time , 5 December 2004
Author: JamesLisk (james.lisk@sympatico.ca) from Belleville, Ontario, Canada
Beyond Dreams Door was essentially the most important film in my young movie-watching life, and for good reason, as it represents everything a film should be - dynamic, experimental and most importantly, intelligent. It also yielded the notion, at least to me, that low-budget independent cinema was where the true passionate visionaries existed, people like Jay Woelfel.
Utilizing elements from popular culture and new wave French cinema and working with a limited budget and a mostly in experienced cast and crew, Jay Woelfel managed to craft a stylish cerebral film that dares to takes chances like few films before it were willing to do.
Bypassing the conventional formula exercised in most other horror films, Woelfel chooses to operate in a non-linear format (remember, this pre-dated Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs by a few years) while also utilizing Hitchcock's various laws of systematization, specifically the use of colors, and the lighting schemes of the various characters. Add to this various other subtle factors that fail to stand-out during the initial viewings, but become quite prominent the more the film is examined, and, in the end, what you are left with is an important film, that is essentially way way ahead of its time.
The movie concerns a shy Ohio Psychology student Benjamin Dobbs, played by Nick Baldasare, who finds himself plagued by a series of horrific inter-connecting nightmares, after he unknowingly agrees to be apart of a dream research experiment. Ben's initial sense that the dreams might have something to do with the untimely loss of his parents quickly fades as they become increasingly stranger and more terrifying. Unable to cope, Ben seeks help in the form of the various on-campus teachers. His psychology professor Dr. Noxx, played Norm Singer, is his first obvious choice, and Noxx easily embraces Ben's pleas for help as something real. After looking into it, the two come upon a notation in a book, and a case history of another man named D.F. White, that seems to point definitively to the existence of the very things Ben has been dreaming about. Ben quickly discovers the 'things' in the dream realm aren't happy with the sudden Earthbound knowledge of their reality, and quickly take it upon themselves to get the evidence back any way they can. Woelfel makes a point to not render any religious allusions, and the doorway, and what lies beyond, remains vague enough for the viewers to decide for themselves what 'the beyond' actually is.
As the film unfolds, we also note that the narrative changes hands, along with the usage of colorful composition, as Ben passes on knowledge of his curse to the various people he asks for help. The second person to get swallowed up in Ben's nightmares is a teaching assistant Eric Baxter, played by Rick Kesler, who early on is posed a question by Noxx about what he would do if confronted with a life or death question -- and through the course of the film, is allowed to truly answer it. Baxter's initial reasons for helping Ben, and his later insistence that "It's not my problem" point to a screenplay not constructed to fit a formula, rather, the real actions of a three dimensional character. Also aiding Ben on his quest for answers is D.F. White (Daniel White) who died nearly twenty years earlier, and appears to him in the form of a ghostly apparition, or guardian angel, as one friend in college put it. The enigmatic White offers up cryptic words of advice, while leading Ben through the land of the dead and into the proverbial "light".
Visually the film is stunning, and the usage of color as a means of depicting the various character's motivations, is amazing. Personally, it was the first time I had ever seen it used before in film. Woelfel's insistence on telling the story in a non-linear format means a lot of jumping around, back-tracking, and various other things that will make for fun multiple viewings. Woelfel also avoids spoon-feeding his audience. Rather than pointing out the obvious, he allows the viewer to make up their own mind about what they are seeing. In my opinion, the film is much more effective because of this fact. The musical score, also composed by Jay Woelfel, is very good as it helps to add some genuine atmosphere to the film.
A few people have complained that the acting was stiff, but I felt it fit perfectly with the tone of the film, which is easily one of the more somber pieces one is likely to see. The special effects were lacking for the most part, but that doesn't take anything away from the piece as it becomes abundantly clear that this film is not about the boogeyman-in-the-closet but rather the psychology behind the boogeyman-in-the-closet.
Beyond Dreams Door is a cult film that has earned its status. It garnered much discussion and many long debates from my various friends in college, each with a differing theory one what, or who, Benjamin Dobbs is, and what actually lied beyond 'The Beyond'. I personally believe that Beyond Dreams Door should be mandatory viewing by anyone with a true interest in film. I highly recommend it.
Low-budget film-making at its absolute best!
Very impressive attempt given the low budget., 18 November 2007

Author: t-birkhead from United Kingdom
The budget for this one is obviously low, with amateurish acting and cheap, occasionally silly effects. The acting is the greater issue though, for the effects are quite endearingly gross in a few places and also deployed to maximum effect in the service of an excellent, vaguely Lovecraftian plot line. The plot and writing are the best thing here, keeping the story gripping and masterfully unfolding the strange events. Even the low grade acting can't dampen the intrigue that this movie conjures and there are times, especially during the trippy, surrealistic dream sequences that the movie is pretty darn cool. Also Darby Vasbinder is very nice to look at as the dream temptress. The film comes close to an eight for me, but is taken down by the ending, which ends up a little generic and tedious, compounded by the effects showing their budget and the acting not managing to convince. This stops the film from being fully satisfying, although it is still well worthwhile for the more adventurous minded horror fan.
2 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :-

Darby Vasbinder is Stunning!, 12 June 2003
Author: spalkin (spalkin@sbcglobal.net) from Worthington, Ohio
A dark, complicated horror flick with the "cultability" of Phantasm! Jay Woelful's best effort and casting the absolutely beautiful Darby Vasbinder as the Dream Babe is perfect! She's a dream come true. Done on a shoestring budget, this movie is still able to conjur up enough imagination to give you night mares, or dreams of Darby Vasbinder!
3 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :-

Very very dull film, 30 September 1998
Author: Clayton from Mt Pleasant, MI
The box promises a lot more than this film delivers, as a large majority of the film is dull, repetitive, hopelessly cheap dream sequences accomplished with a fog machine and colored lights. The acting is poor, and it looks like a handful of college students decided to throw together this schlocky film on a boring weekend. The overall premise is intriguing, but the film fails to deliver on its promises.
Add another comment
Related Links