Io sto con gli ippopotami (1979)

User Rating:

6.2/10   

Director:

Italo Zingarelli

Writers:

Barbara Alberti (writer) and
Amedeo Pagani (writer) ...

Release Date:

1 December 1979 (Spain)

Genre:

Adventure | Comedy | Action

Plot:

In Africa, many years ago, Slim and Tom don't like it when a German tyrant, starts selling all of the African wildlife to Canadian Zoo's...

Plot Keywords:

Africa | Brawl | Fistfight | Animal | Fight

Awards:

1 win

Cast

Terence Hill	...	Slim
Bud Spencer	...	Tom
Joe Bugner	...	Ormond
May Dlamini	...	Mama Leone
Dawn Jürgens	...	Stella (Slim's lady-love)
Malcolm Kirk	...	Ormond's bald henchman
Ben Masinga	...	Jason
Les Marcowitz
Johan Naude
Nick Van Rensburg
Hugh Rouse	...	Police Captain, arresting Slim and Tom
Mike Schutte	...	Ormond's henchman (German version: Lumpi)
Kosie Smith	...	Ormond's henchman with moustache (German version: Kopf, wie 'n Hauklotz)
Joseph Szucs
rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Sandy Nkomo	...	Senghor (Stella's father) (as Sandy Ngkomo)

Also Known As:

I'm for the Hippopotamus

Runtime:

Germany:95 min | Argentina:98 min | Spain:91 min (DVD edition)

Country:

Italy

Language:

Italian

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1

Certification:

Spain:T | Finland:K-12 | Norway:15 (re-rating) | Norway:16 (original rating) | Sweden:15 | UK:PG | West Germany:12 | Argentina:Atp

Company:

Denver Film Productions

Goofs:

Continuity: After the lunch Tom opens a set of cages with lions (and a cheetah) in them. He opens them from right to left. But the 2 cages we see him opening in close-up, still have closed cages with lions in them to their right.

Movie Connections:

Referenced in Chispita y sus gorilas (1982)

Soundtrack:

GRAU GRAU GRAU

Good for children

beautiful film. As to the usual one, the usual negative comments which talk about a classical film some years 80 which everyone does not like it to the nostalgic ones are met.Sure Heros that this film had to have a judgment in this site. In fact reviewers' good part has put a high vote to the previous episodes. Because this contrast? I know the reason. Since assumptive reviewers' good part favorably sees the past and as the past is "better" than the present they have given several credit to the preceding episodes being still the last episode more explosive and spectacular. At this point should reject also the old episodes but there are here two weights and two measure.In fact also cinema masterpieces have been criticized and denigrated. Good part some reviewers of this site belong to the very bad reviewers. Better think separately with its head.