17 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :- Sweeping piece of art, 7 November 2004
Author:
Axel Mishael Muñoz (swingo@cbgb.net) from Aguascalientes, Ags.
The last time I felt swept and moved by a movie with so much depth was
when I saw "Andrei Rublev" and "Eternity and a Day", and this movie is
such like them when it fails to become a movie and becomes a modern
piece of art.
It was like if someone would've been reading me a poem whilst watching
such beautiful landscapes. And all through that, you feel in your own
skin the love for their own soil. it seems as if they had been rooted
to the grounds.
Certainly it is not for everyone's tastes but it is truly a moving
experience.
Axel.
16 out of 21 people found the following comment useful :- One of the Greats, 24 January 2001
Author:
Jean-7 from Seattle
Very rarely, films transcend their medium and break through into some other
dimension. These are not merely technically superb films with fine
cinematography and wonderful performances. Rather, something else has been
addressed; at the risk of seeming pompous, I'd call it "what it means to be
human." Maybe some of you know what I'm talking about. After the film is
over, you walk out into the world and your life has changed in some
fundamental way. You actually experience colors and shapes and smells
afresh, as though you've re-emerged into a different universe.
I can think of several films that have had that effect on me. Eric Rohmer's
"Summer (Le Rayon Vert)" and Kieslowski's "Decalogue" spring to mind. But
"Tree of Wooden Clogs" approached the core. I'm not Catholic, would
pronounce myself an atheist if that didn't suggest the arrogance of
certainty, but this movie comes as close to touching the soul as any I've
ever seen. It is one of the most shattering, delightful, and profound works
of art ever created. After first seeing it, I sat in my car, clutched the
steering wheel, and sobbed for half an hour.
Since that day, many years ago, moments from it continue to haunt me. I'll
be walking down a street lined with trees and remember the boy walking home
from school. Out of the blue, the looks on the faces of the just-married
young couple as they adopt a child will come to me. And, of course, the
image of the villagers watching the lone wagon disappear into the darkness
is one which will live with me until I die.
In short, as I stumble my own way through life, this film is one of the
touchstones that reminds me why I'm here.
12 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :- How to film an epic., 9 May 2006
Author:
anna-k-2 from United Kingdom
Yes, it lasts three hours. Yes, it is about a village community where
nothing much happens. Not your typical man save-woman blow-up joint
scenario, definitely. All this is said on the package, therefore I
truly do not understand people who criticise this film for slowness. OF
COURSE it is going to be slow, what do you expect? After this private
note, some review. The film is excellent and highly recommendable for
many reasons. First of all, the shooting: the use of non-professional
actors,authentic settings and a real-life focus makes this film feel
like a documentary, although it is set over a hundred years in the
past. It therefore gives an unprecedented opportunity to peek into the
life of rural Lombardy at the turn of the centuries. Secondly, the
plot. Slow as it is, it sucks you in nonetheless, as you get
emotionally involved with the beautifully depicted community of
families. Full of small and big dramas, the film does not cease to
surprise till the very end. Finally, perhaps the biggest asset of the
movie is the loving, but realistic depiction of the times. There is
dirt, hard work and cow dung, but there is also nature, family, and
most importantly - love. If you speak some Italian, the additional perk
is the beautiful dialect. Highly, highly recommend!
If there were any reason for dropping out of normal life and dedicating
oneself entirely to watching Italian films, this might be it! The
majestic simplicity and dignity of this film make even the best
contemporary films seem trivial and stillborn by comparison. Loved by
sensitive audiences and critics alike, Ermanno Olmi's movie describes
incidents in the lives of four families sharecropping in Lombardy at
the coming of the twentieth century. Olmi's extraordinary command of
imagery, movement, rhythm, and lighting conveys a potent nostalgia for
Earth and the family of man. There is a scene in which images of a
father carving clogs for his shoeless boy are intercut with the lives
of the farm families. The music accompanying that scene is a Bach organ
chorale. The effect is almost sacramental and entirely overwhelming and
may be one of my favorite scenes in all cinema. That scene alone is
worth more than all the digitalized special effects, car crashes, ocean
liner sinkings, and the deafening Dolby vapidity of so much of the
inane junk embraced undiscriminatingly by so many. If they only had the
eyes to see, ears to hear, and the soul to love this wondrous work of
art!
The most authentic version on this film has the original Bergamasco
dialect track. The newer DVDs from Italy have the option of choosing
this soundtrack.
14 out of 20 people found the following comment useful :- The film will be with me for a long time., 7 May 1999
Author:
Michael Sapienza (new1sapi@tir.com) from Livonia, Michigan
An artistic masterpiece that almost any observant Catholic will cherish,
especially an Italian Catholic. It is unclear how nonbelievers will
connect
to the film. By watching the film one discovers that while material
possessions may make life easier they certainly can be a stumbling block
on
the path to sanctity. These peasants really put late twentieth century
American Catholics to shame.
The film slowly unveils to the viewers one year in the life of Italian
peasants at the close of the nineteenth century. That's about it.
There's
no hero, no antagonist, and no great wrong that gets set right; it's
simply
a slice of life. I do not want to reveal too much of the story because I
think it will spoil it for the viewer.
The film can serve as an educational tool for viewers with children. It's
like going to an outdoor historical museum, only the viewer gets to see
everything that it would take one whole year to see at the museum
(without
the crowds). For example, the director takes the time to show
painstakingly
what it was like to wash clothes one hundred years ago. It's essentially
a
living documentary of late nineteenth century Italian provincial life.
Most American audiences will have to get used to the slow pace of the
film.
Even the humor is extremely subtle. Surprisingly, I enjoyed the pace.
The
pace was silent, peaceful, and steadfast just as the families are in the
film. To me it is an escape (ironically an escape from an escape) from
many
of today's films that just explode with sound effects and rock music;
films
that move at blurring speed with scene cuts that are made with the intent
to
maximize audience stimulation but often with the result of increasing our
stress level. This movie is a restful reprieve.
6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- jump in, 29 August 2005
Author:
mgrindberg from Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
A mosaic of peasant life in Lombardy at the turn of the twentieth
century that slowly moves along for three hours but never comes close
to losing interest thanks to the wealth of details and (though amateur)
moving performances. In the title lies the heartwrenching conclusion
abruptly reached after the meandering and soulful journey that is taken
into the lives of a group of peasant families, with the butchering of a
goose and later a pig, a marriage, a boatride to Milan, and a dinner
amongst the sisters of a convent while the stirrings of political
change and repression stay mainly in the background but are there to
see. While the focus is on the peasants, the world that the movie
creates is more like being there than any other film around.
7 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :- A sublime hypnotic narrative., 9 May 1999
Author:
Rigor from Chicago, USA
This film really surprises. It is long and detailed, yet, it is
amazingly suspenseful. The quiet sturdy look at rural life in
Italy manages to accomplish the amazing feet of truly "being" a
film of "the oppressed" rather than a mere analysis of "the
wretched of the earth". Olmi's direction of the non-professional
cast is superb and the film is beautifully shot and edited.
Don't be afraid of this film. It does not actually seem long,
nor does it seem aimless or plotless. While one may say that
"the whole pesant community" is the real protagonist there are
clearly defined characters in the film whose narratives we
follow. In fact, the films strategy is one of integration of
these narrative strands in a seemingly coherent and logical
way.
A wonderful, very emotionally moving experience with a clear,
sharp, political analysis.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- textured, organic, and great, 10 August 2004
Author:
chris miller (chris@aptpupil.org) from davis, california
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
may be some spoilers... this film's style reminds me of a cross between
the godfather (because of the colors) and kiarostami's work (because of
the pace, texture and sound design). the opening shot is of a field of
tall grasses and we know right away that this is going to be an organic
film about earthy matters. the film's visual style, particularly its
earthy color scheme, reinforce this fact. at just shy of three hours
the film is remarkably slim on plot. in an averagely paced simpsons
episode there would likely be an equal amount of plot in the first
seven minute act, as there is in this entire film. that's both a
testament to the quick storytelling of the simpsons, and the slow,
plot less, drive of this film. but i'm not averse to a lack of plot.
what drives the film is the characters and their interactions with the
land and their neighbors. the film's trailer says the film follows
three families, the netflix synopsis says four families are the subject
of the film, and allmovie.com says five families are followed. hmmm. i
didn't really keep track, and it sort of depends upon whether you count
the newlyweds at the end of the film as a separate family. but i
digress.
the film's texture is amazing. kiarostami, and iranian cinema in
general, have a similar texture and i think a lot of it is owed to the
way they mix the sound. it's as if the microphone is on the ground at
all times. first, i should note that most of the sound work was looped
in in post-production instead of being done while filming. every step
in the film can be heard, and is usually high in the mix. to me this
technique grants an extra layer of texture to the film. it make the
film all the more tactile and real when you can hear the dirt and rocks
crunch under a person's footsteps. since the film is about
three/four/five families of farmers, this sound design makes perfect
sense. if it were a victorian period piece, the same sound design would
be misplaced.somehow the film was able to completely draw me into the
farmers' way of thinking. about two hours through the film there is a
single shot of a cluster of bees on a wall, rather than associating
this image with danger (a typical response within a typical film), i
immediately associated it with a honey treat. in this way the film was
able to get me thinking of nature as useful and friendly, instead of an
enemy which must be conquered. it was a subtle response, but a telling
one. besides the importance of nature, major themes addressed include
the intertwined nature of life/death, the importance of community, and
religion. it's a good film, and even though not much actually happens
in the usual sense, it addresses, directly and indirectly, all sorts of
universal concerns. unlike "princess and the warrior," this is a film
that on paper probably looks rather unimpressive, but in its filmed
state is actually quite a stunning (in its simplicity) piece of work.
B++.
8 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :- An excellent portrayal of Italian peasant life, 4 April 2000
Author:
mctheimer from Bellevue, Washington, USA
This movie could have been made any time after the development of color
film. Unless you look at the tape jacket, you wouldn't know what year it
had been filmed. It is timeless.
"Tree" follows the lives of three peasant families in the Lombardy
(northern) region of Italy. The historical accuracy appears to be quite
high. You'll learn how things were done before electricity, the automobile,
etc. Watching this film reminded me of visiting Bali or Morocco; I felt
immersed in another culture in another time.
The downside is that, of course, peasants don't live terribly exciting
lives, and this is a long movie. There isn't really a plot driving the
film. What I considered to be the action scenes are grisly; livestock is
slaughtered on camera, and it's clear that you are watching the real thing.
(I almost started crying while watching a pig as it is was slaughtered; it
was squealing loudly as it was literally eviscerated while it was still
alive.)
This is a contemplative film. The film which I think would be an
interesting companion piece would be "The Scent of Green Papaya," a
Vietnamese film with about the same pace and purpose.
5 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :- Pasolini's children, 26 August 2002
Author:
Mr_Hulot from Boston, MA
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Spoilers ahead.
An unusual film and a definite change of pace from the rapid-fire
filmmaking that Americans are used to. This film follows a year in the life
of rural Italian peasants living at the turn of the century. There is a
central plotline, a family who wants their son to know a better life then
they have tries to send him to school. However the clogs that carry him on
the long and hard journey to school are broken, making the path impossible.
The central message of the film is that God will provide. It is a sermon on
the virtues of simple faith.
However, this central plot, very similar to a fairy tale is only a device
to allow the film to devote three and a half hours to showing in great
detail the lives of the Italian peasantry during this period, the way they
worked, loved and lived. It's a slice of life film like Fellini's Roma, or
Spike Lee's Do the Right Thing, but it's much less frenzied and
sensationalistic then those works. Like most Italian cinema that I have
seen it is more focused around intense images then around plot of dialogue,
I will never forget the shots of the landscape, or the scene of the peasants
preparing a pig for eating. Central to the film is the beautiful sermon
that we hear the village priest offer.
Interestingly, the film focuses on the lives of those people that Pasolini
glorified in his films and novels. Pasolini died a few years before the
film was released, during most of his life he considered the values of the
peasants to be sacred, an antidote to the fierce and brutal ethic of the
modern world. By the end of his life, he had given up hope in the peasants,
believing that the mass media had exterminated their native culture and way
of life. It would be economically and culturally impossible to revive in
the modern world the system of living that the peasants
shared.
The Tree of Wooden Clogs is a requiem for a dead way of life, released at
precisely the time that that culture was drawing its last breath. Watching
it is a beautiful and melancholy experience. It's a wonderful film, but one
cannot escape a feeling of irrevocable loss.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglinestrailers and videospostersphoto galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Albero degli zoccoli, L' (1978)
17 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :-

Sweeping piece of art, 7 November 2004
Author: Axel Mishael Muñoz (swingo@cbgb.net) from Aguascalientes, Ags.
The last time I felt swept and moved by a movie with so much depth was when I saw "Andrei Rublev" and "Eternity and a Day", and this movie is such like them when it fails to become a movie and becomes a modern piece of art.
It was like if someone would've been reading me a poem whilst watching such beautiful landscapes. And all through that, you feel in your own skin the love for their own soil. it seems as if they had been rooted to the grounds.
Certainly it is not for everyone's tastes but it is truly a moving experience.
Axel.
16 out of 21 people found the following comment useful :-

One of the Greats, 24 January 2001
Author: Jean-7 from Seattle
Very rarely, films transcend their medium and break through into some other dimension. These are not merely technically superb films with fine cinematography and wonderful performances. Rather, something else has been addressed; at the risk of seeming pompous, I'd call it "what it means to be human." Maybe some of you know what I'm talking about. After the film is over, you walk out into the world and your life has changed in some fundamental way. You actually experience colors and shapes and smells afresh, as though you've re-emerged into a different universe.
I can think of several films that have had that effect on me. Eric Rohmer's "Summer (Le Rayon Vert)" and Kieslowski's "Decalogue" spring to mind. But "Tree of Wooden Clogs" approached the core. I'm not Catholic, would pronounce myself an atheist if that didn't suggest the arrogance of certainty, but this movie comes as close to touching the soul as any I've ever seen. It is one of the most shattering, delightful, and profound works of art ever created. After first seeing it, I sat in my car, clutched the steering wheel, and sobbed for half an hour.
Since that day, many years ago, moments from it continue to haunt me. I'll be walking down a street lined with trees and remember the boy walking home from school. Out of the blue, the looks on the faces of the just-married young couple as they adopt a child will come to me. And, of course, the image of the villagers watching the lone wagon disappear into the darkness is one which will live with me until I die.
In short, as I stumble my own way through life, this film is one of the touchstones that reminds me why I'm here.
12 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :-

How to film an epic., 9 May 2006
Author: anna-k-2 from United Kingdom
Yes, it lasts three hours. Yes, it is about a village community where nothing much happens. Not your typical man save-woman blow-up joint scenario, definitely. All this is said on the package, therefore I truly do not understand people who criticise this film for slowness. OF COURSE it is going to be slow, what do you expect? After this private note, some review. The film is excellent and highly recommendable for many reasons. First of all, the shooting: the use of non-professional actors,authentic settings and a real-life focus makes this film feel like a documentary, although it is set over a hundred years in the past. It therefore gives an unprecedented opportunity to peek into the life of rural Lombardy at the turn of the centuries. Secondly, the plot. Slow as it is, it sucks you in nonetheless, as you get emotionally involved with the beautifully depicted community of families. Full of small and big dramas, the film does not cease to surprise till the very end. Finally, perhaps the biggest asset of the movie is the loving, but realistic depiction of the times. There is dirt, hard work and cow dung, but there is also nature, family, and most importantly - love. If you speak some Italian, the additional perk is the beautiful dialect. Highly, highly recommend!
12 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :-
Sacramental epic., 4 December 2001
Author: Gerald A. DeLuca (italiangerry@gmail.com) from United States
If there were any reason for dropping out of normal life and dedicating oneself entirely to watching Italian films, this might be it! The majestic simplicity and dignity of this film make even the best contemporary films seem trivial and stillborn by comparison. Loved by sensitive audiences and critics alike, Ermanno Olmi's movie describes incidents in the lives of four families sharecropping in Lombardy at the coming of the twentieth century. Olmi's extraordinary command of imagery, movement, rhythm, and lighting conveys a potent nostalgia for Earth and the family of man. There is a scene in which images of a father carving clogs for his shoeless boy are intercut with the lives of the farm families. The music accompanying that scene is a Bach organ chorale. The effect is almost sacramental and entirely overwhelming and may be one of my favorite scenes in all cinema. That scene alone is worth more than all the digitalized special effects, car crashes, ocean liner sinkings, and the deafening Dolby vapidity of so much of the inane junk embraced undiscriminatingly by so many. If they only had the eyes to see, ears to hear, and the soul to love this wondrous work of art!
The most authentic version on this film has the original Bergamasco dialect track. The newer DVDs from Italy have the option of choosing this soundtrack.
14 out of 20 people found the following comment useful :-
The film will be with me for a long time., 7 May 1999
Author: Michael Sapienza (new1sapi@tir.com) from Livonia, Michigan
An artistic masterpiece that almost any observant Catholic will cherish, especially an Italian Catholic. It is unclear how nonbelievers will connect to the film. By watching the film one discovers that while material possessions may make life easier they certainly can be a stumbling block on the path to sanctity. These peasants really put late twentieth century American Catholics to shame.
The film slowly unveils to the viewers one year in the life of Italian peasants at the close of the nineteenth century. That's about it. There's no hero, no antagonist, and no great wrong that gets set right; it's simply a slice of life. I do not want to reveal too much of the story because I think it will spoil it for the viewer.
The film can serve as an educational tool for viewers with children. It's like going to an outdoor historical museum, only the viewer gets to see everything that it would take one whole year to see at the museum (without the crowds). For example, the director takes the time to show painstakingly what it was like to wash clothes one hundred years ago. It's essentially a living documentary of late nineteenth century Italian provincial life.
Most American audiences will have to get used to the slow pace of the film. Even the humor is extremely subtle. Surprisingly, I enjoyed the pace. The pace was silent, peaceful, and steadfast just as the families are in the film. To me it is an escape (ironically an escape from an escape) from many of today's films that just explode with sound effects and rock music; films that move at blurring speed with scene cuts that are made with the intent to maximize audience stimulation but often with the result of increasing our stress level. This movie is a restful reprieve.
6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-

jump in, 29 August 2005
Author: mgrindberg from Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
A mosaic of peasant life in Lombardy at the turn of the twentieth century that slowly moves along for three hours but never comes close to losing interest thanks to the wealth of details and (though amateur) moving performances. In the title lies the heartwrenching conclusion abruptly reached after the meandering and soulful journey that is taken into the lives of a group of peasant families, with the butchering of a goose and later a pig, a marriage, a boatride to Milan, and a dinner amongst the sisters of a convent while the stirrings of political change and repression stay mainly in the background but are there to see. While the focus is on the peasants, the world that the movie creates is more like being there than any other film around.
7 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :-

A sublime hypnotic narrative., 9 May 1999
Author: Rigor from Chicago, USA
This film really surprises. It is long and detailed, yet, it is amazingly suspenseful. The quiet sturdy look at rural life in Italy manages to accomplish the amazing feet of truly "being" a film of "the oppressed" rather than a mere analysis of "the wretched of the earth". Olmi's direction of the non-professional cast is superb and the film is beautifully shot and edited.
Don't be afraid of this film. It does not actually seem long, nor does it seem aimless or plotless. While one may say that "the whole pesant community" is the real protagonist there are clearly defined characters in the film whose narratives we follow. In fact, the films strategy is one of integration of these narrative strands in a seemingly coherent and logical way. A wonderful, very emotionally moving experience with a clear, sharp, political analysis.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-
textured, organic, and great, 10 August 2004
Author: chris miller (chris@aptpupil.org) from davis, california
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
may be some spoilers... this film's style reminds me of a cross between the godfather (because of the colors) and kiarostami's work (because of the pace, texture and sound design). the opening shot is of a field of tall grasses and we know right away that this is going to be an organic film about earthy matters. the film's visual style, particularly its earthy color scheme, reinforce this fact. at just shy of three hours the film is remarkably slim on plot. in an averagely paced simpsons episode there would likely be an equal amount of plot in the first seven minute act, as there is in this entire film. that's both a testament to the quick storytelling of the simpsons, and the slow, plot less, drive of this film. but i'm not averse to a lack of plot. what drives the film is the characters and their interactions with the land and their neighbors. the film's trailer says the film follows three families, the netflix synopsis says four families are the subject of the film, and allmovie.com says five families are followed. hmmm. i didn't really keep track, and it sort of depends upon whether you count the newlyweds at the end of the film as a separate family. but i digress.
the film's texture is amazing. kiarostami, and iranian cinema in general, have a similar texture and i think a lot of it is owed to the way they mix the sound. it's as if the microphone is on the ground at all times. first, i should note that most of the sound work was looped in in post-production instead of being done while filming. every step in the film can be heard, and is usually high in the mix. to me this technique grants an extra layer of texture to the film. it make the film all the more tactile and real when you can hear the dirt and rocks crunch under a person's footsteps. since the film is about three/four/five families of farmers, this sound design makes perfect sense. if it were a victorian period piece, the same sound design would be misplaced.somehow the film was able to completely draw me into the farmers' way of thinking. about two hours through the film there is a single shot of a cluster of bees on a wall, rather than associating this image with danger (a typical response within a typical film), i immediately associated it with a honey treat. in this way the film was able to get me thinking of nature as useful and friendly, instead of an enemy which must be conquered. it was a subtle response, but a telling one. besides the importance of nature, major themes addressed include the intertwined nature of life/death, the importance of community, and religion. it's a good film, and even though not much actually happens in the usual sense, it addresses, directly and indirectly, all sorts of universal concerns. unlike "princess and the warrior," this is a film that on paper probably looks rather unimpressive, but in its filmed state is actually quite a stunning (in its simplicity) piece of work. B++.
8 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :-

An excellent portrayal of Italian peasant life, 4 April 2000
Author: mctheimer from Bellevue, Washington, USA
This movie could have been made any time after the development of color film. Unless you look at the tape jacket, you wouldn't know what year it had been filmed. It is timeless.
"Tree" follows the lives of three peasant families in the Lombardy (northern) region of Italy. The historical accuracy appears to be quite high. You'll learn how things were done before electricity, the automobile, etc. Watching this film reminded me of visiting Bali or Morocco; I felt immersed in another culture in another time.
The downside is that, of course, peasants don't live terribly exciting lives, and this is a long movie. There isn't really a plot driving the film. What I considered to be the action scenes are grisly; livestock is slaughtered on camera, and it's clear that you are watching the real thing. (I almost started crying while watching a pig as it is was slaughtered; it was squealing loudly as it was literally eviscerated while it was still alive.)
This is a contemplative film. The film which I think would be an interesting companion piece would be "The Scent of Green Papaya," a Vietnamese film with about the same pace and purpose.
5 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-

Pasolini's children, 26 August 2002
Author: Mr_Hulot from Boston, MA
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Spoilers ahead.
An unusual film and a definite change of pace from the rapid-fire filmmaking that Americans are used to. This film follows a year in the life of rural Italian peasants living at the turn of the century. There is a central plotline, a family who wants their son to know a better life then they have tries to send him to school. However the clogs that carry him on the long and hard journey to school are broken, making the path impossible. The central message of the film is that God will provide. It is a sermon on the virtues of simple faith.
However, this central plot, very similar to a fairy tale is only a device to allow the film to devote three and a half hours to showing in great detail the lives of the Italian peasantry during this period, the way they worked, loved and lived. It's a slice of life film like Fellini's Roma, or Spike Lee's Do the Right Thing, but it's much less frenzied and sensationalistic then those works. Like most Italian cinema that I have seen it is more focused around intense images then around plot of dialogue, I will never forget the shots of the landscape, or the scene of the peasants preparing a pig for eating. Central to the film is the beautiful sermon that we hear the village priest offer.
Interestingly, the film focuses on the lives of those people that Pasolini glorified in his films and novels. Pasolini died a few years before the film was released, during most of his life he considered the values of the peasants to be sacred, an antidote to the fierce and brutal ethic of the modern world. By the end of his life, he had given up hope in the peasants, believing that the mass media had exterminated their native culture and way of life. It would be economically and culturally impossible to revive in the modern world the system of living that the peasants shared.
The Tree of Wooden Clogs is a requiem for a dead way of life, released at precisely the time that that culture was drawing its last breath. Watching it is a beautiful and melancholy experience. It's a wonderful film, but one cannot escape a feeling of irrevocable loss.
Add another comment
Related Links