| Carla Gravina | ... | Ippolita Oderisi | |
| Mel Ferrer | ... | Massimo Oderisi | |
| Arthur Kennedy | ... | Bishop Ascanio Oderisi | |
| George Coulouris | ... | Father Mittner | |
| Alida Valli | ... | Irene | |
| Mario Scaccia | ... | Faith Healer | |
| Umberto Orsini | ... | Dr. Marcello Sinibaldi | |
| Anita Strindberg | ... | Greta | |
| Remo Girone | ... | Filippo Oderisi | |
| Ernesto Colli | ... | Possessed Man | |
| Bruno Tocci | ... | Possessed Man's Friend | |
| Beatrice De Bono | ... | Woman healed by statue | |
| Vittorio Fanfoni | ... | (credit only) | |
| Luigi Antonio Guerra | ... | (credit only) | |
| rest of cast listed alphabetically: | |||
| Lea Lander | ... | Mariangela (uncredited) | |
| John Francis Lane | ... | Party guest (uncredited) | |
| Giuseppe Marrocco | ... | Oderisi servant (uncredited) | |
Directed by | |||
| Alberto De Martino | |||
Writing credits(in alphabetical order) | ||
| Gianfranco Clerici | writer | |
| Alberto De Martino | writer | |
| Vincenzo Mannino | writer | |
Produced by | |||
| Edmondo Amati | .... | producer | |
Original Music by | |||
| Ennio Morricone | |||
| Bruno Nicolai | |||
Cinematography by | |||
| Joe D'Amato | (as Aristide Massaccesi) | ||
Film Editing by | |||
| Vincenzo Tomassi | |||
Art Direction by | |||
| Uberto Bertacca | |||
Makeup Department | |||
| Euclide Santoli | .... | makeup artist | |
Production Management | |||
| Alfredo Nicolai | .... | production manager | |
Camera and Electrical Department | |||
| Adolfo Troiani | .... | camera operator | |
Other crew | |||
| Peter Fernandez | .... | voice director (English version) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| The Exorcist | Amityville II: The Possession | The Omen | Un urlo nelle tenebre | La terza madre |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Drama section | IMDb Italy section | Add this title to MyMovies |
There are exactly two elements in this movie that work. The first is a well-done special effect of an imploding screen. The second is the choice to have the saliva of the possessed woman bear an unmistakable resemblance to... another substance. This becomes the only element of the sexual subtext that is genuinely unsettling, rather than just unpleasant and nasty.
Other than that, this is a poorly-made attempt to rip off "The Exorcist". And by "rip off", I don't mean just that this was a possession movie made to cash in on the popularity of "The Exorcist"; I mean that elements from the Blatty/Friedkin production are copied so shamelessly that it evokes disbelieving laughter at the effrontery.
Sadly, "The Tempter" fails to do what "The Exorcist" did, and give those elements a context that makes sense. The Blatty/Friedkin film remains compelling because it is a mystery; it is not about the shocking visual effects but rather of a truth that no one wants to believe. Every scene contains a clue to the mystery; every clue chips away at civilized denial that such a thing could happen. This movie could actually have gone "The Exorcist" one better, by constructing the same sort of mystery and treating the strong subtext of sexual temptation as a piece of the puzzle and not just a chance for cheap thrills. Instead, this movie is made with the vague notion that projectile vomiting at a priest is boffo box office, baby. "The Exorcist" is clockwork inside and "The Tempter" is just Jell-O.