Overview
MOVIEmeter: 
Up 28% in popularity this week. See
why on
IMDbPro.
Release Date:
12 March 1970 (USA)
more
Plot:
Mouchette is a young teenager living in the tough country. Her mother is going to die, and her father does not take care of her...
more
|
add synopsis
Awards:
4 wins
&
1 nomination
more
User Comments:
"compassionate", "unflinching", or just a snare?
more (14 total)
Additional Details
Runtime:
78 min | USA:90 min (VHS version) | Portugal:82 min
Aspect Ratio:
1.66 : 1
more
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
It was rumored for years that the trailer for this film was by
Jean-Luc Godard, and he has recently confirmed this by programming it in a self-curated retrospective of his work. The trailer is virtually a miniature essay on (or subversion of) the film, jarringly intercutting excerpts from it with a written commentary that calls it "Christian and sadistic".
more
Goofs:
Continuity: Two guys deliver cases of bottles and then have a drink. The younger man puts down an empty glass, but in the next shot, some remains in the glass.
more
Soundtrack:
Magnificat
more
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
more (14 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on
IMDb message board for Mouchette (1967)
more
Recommendations
Related Links
It seems entirely appropriate that the film opens with the metaphor of birds being snared as this seems to apply not only to Mouchette's life, but to Bresson's approach to the viewer as well.
For what, after all, is the director attempting to do here? Are we really to regard this as an unblinking gaze into the life of an abused, outcast girl? If so, why is Bresson so intent on excluding even the most fleeting moments of joy (or at least humor) that enter even the darkest of lives (I believe a philosopher once said "alas, joy too must have its day")? It is pretty telling that the one scene involving happiness for Mouchette is the most monotonous and lifeless in the picture (the bumper cars). Not only are we not allowed to experience her joy, but Bresson is careful to distance us from the real experience of her pain as well. This is done by the use of "gestures" (particularly prominent in Bresson's later films) that "signify" a character's experience rather than giving us the person's individualized emotional and visceral reactions to events. Thus the assault on Mouchette is shown in a distant, almost pantomimed manner, her relationship with her father is suggested by dropping coins in his hand, a disembodied hand slapping her face, etc. So, are we really to identify with Mouchette, to feel her pain, seeing how her experience of life intersects with our own in only the most symbolic, muted fashion? Is this really "compassion" and is this really Bresson's purpose?
Or is Mouchette a figure that Bresson uses (and dehumanizes), as literally every character in the movie uses her, to achieve other purposes? In this case the selling of a particular view of the world. One which sees the world as a snare, both in its joy and its pain, that is "saved" only by the (symbolic) suffering of the innocent, and transcended/transformed only by death. In other words a viewpoint that that advocates looking beyond (or turning away from)life to find "transcendent" truths. A view based on judgement rather than acceptance. And if this is "the truth" why must so much of what we experience as truth (such as joy, intimacy, occasional feelings of "oneness" with the world) be so forcibly excluded? Are these all really illusions, the world simply a snare? And without acceptance of ALL of Mouchette's reality can she,or any of us, really be redeemed?
Yes, Bresson is a meticulous, incisive, and occasionally powerful filmaker. But is he really honest? Are there some TRUTHS that he can't face (and so desperately restricts his view). In MOUCHETTE we are a little more aware of the puppeteer's strings than usual. 7 out of 10.