IMDb >
A Man for All Seasons (1966)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at Blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsA Man for All Seasons (1966) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 26 | slideshow) | Videos (see all 2) |
          |
|
Overview
User Rating:
Director:
Writers:
Release Date:
1967 (Japan)
more
Tagline:
...a motion picture for all times!
Plot:
The story of Thomas More, who stood up to King Henry VIII when the King rejected the Roman Catholic Church to obtain a divorce and remarriage. full summary | full synopsis
Plot Keywords:
Awards:
Won 6 Oscars.
Another 27 wins
&
5 nominations
more
NewsDesk:
(8 articles)
The second outing of John Hurt
(From The Guardian - TV News. 20 November 2009, 4:11 PM, PST)
The second outing of John Hurt
(From The Guardian - Film News. 20 November 2009, 4:11 PM, PST)
(From The Guardian - TV News. 20 November 2009, 4:11 PM, PST)
The second outing of John Hurt
(From The Guardian - Film News. 20 November 2009, 4:11 PM, PST)
User Comments:
Fantastically acted, beautifully shot
more (125 total)
US TV Schedule:
Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only) | Paul Scofield | ... | Thomas More |
 | Wendy Hiller | ... | Alice |
| Leo McKern | ... | Cromwell |
| Robert Shaw | ... | Henry VIII |
 | Orson Welles | ... | Cardinal Wolsey |
| Susannah York | ... | Margaret |
| Nigel Davenport | ... | Duke of Norfolk |
 | John Hurt | ... | Rich |
| Corin Redgrave | ... | Roper |
| Colin Blakely | ... | Matthew |
| Cyril Luckham | ... | Archbishop Cranmer |
 | Jack Gwillim | ... | Chief Justice |
| Thomas Heathcote | ... | Boatman |
| Yootha Joyce | ... | Averil Machin |
| Anthony Nicholls | ... | King's Representative |
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
120 min
Country:
Color:
Color (Technicolor)
Aspect Ratio:
1.66 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Mono (Westrex Recording System)
Certification:
Iceland:L |
West Germany:12 (nf) |
Brazil:Livre |
Sweden:11 |
Argentina:13 |
Australia:G |
Finland:K-12 |
Singapore:PG |
Spain:13 |
UK:U |
USA:Approved (original rating) |
USA:G (re-rating) (1971)
Filming Locations:
Company:
Fun Stuff
Trivia:
Paul Scofield and Leo McKern reprised the roles they played in the Broadway production of the play. During most of the play's 20-month run, the role of Margaret was played by a young Faye Dunaway.
more
Goofs:
Anachronisms: In the scene where King Henry first visits Thomas More's house, we see a yellow Labrador Retriever running to the house. However, the dog with the specific physical characteristics that we associate Labradors with today (and that was shown), wasn't bred yet.
more
Quotes:
William Roper:
So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!
Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!
Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
more
Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!
Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
more
Movie Connections:
Referenced in Behind the Tunes: Bugs - A Rabbit for All Seasonings (2003) (V)
more
FAQ
Is Man for All Seasons historically accuratemore
more (125 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for A Man for All Seasons (1966) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| The Other Boleyn Girl | Anne of the Thousand Days | Luther | Elizabeth | Young Bess |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Biography section | IMDb UK section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |
`A Man For All Seasons', much like the film `Becket', is about a man standing up to his king, with tragic results. In this film the man is Sir Thomas More (Paul Scofield) a well-liked and well-respected lawyer and the king is Henry VIII (Robert Shaw). Henry VIII wants to divorce his wife and marry another, something illegal by the courts of England. But since he is the king and he is fond of executions, practically no one objects, except More, who refuses to believe that anyone is above the law, even his king.
It's not that More objects, rather that he doesn't go along with it. He never says he's against it – because that way he could be charged with treason – but he doesn't sign the new law passed in favor of the king. He could get away with this, of course, but Henry VIII stubbornly refuses to have any opposition, and the rest of the movie is spent on characters trying to persuade More to abide, for this reason or that. There is also a subplot about Richard Rich (a young John Hurt) and Thomas Cromwell (Leo McKern) plotting to frame More to quiet him.
That is what I got from the plot, at least. I could be wrong. It was hard to follow, this film, because of the fast fury of dialogue in each scene, never relenting for the audience to understand. This fast approach to the subject matter wasn't too tedious, but it did prompt me to rewind a few times to hear things over.
That, I am glad to say, is the movie's only flaw. Everything else is wonderful. The acting was great. Scofield creates a sense of pride, duty, confidence and principle with his character that gives him a high, strong presence whenever he's onscreen. His character is complex and in a way simple. Simple: he's refusing to relent not because he believes strongly on the issues of marriage and divorce, but because he believes strongly that no one, not even the king, is above the law. Complex: his strength and duty begins to become self-destructive when he is jailed, his family is made poor and unhappy and he loses respect from most around him, all the while still refusing to conform. An Oscar well deserved.
The rest of the cast rounds out nicely. We have Orson Welles in a small role as the gruff Cardinal Wolsey, Leo McKern using scorn as his technique as Cromwell, Hurt playing a sad role that goes from nice and likable to selfish and nasty, and much others. Ones that stood out for me were Robert Shaw and Wendy Hiller, both Oscar nominated. Shaw is loud, rude, stupid, and in some way likable as the king, it's not his best performance but it is an entertaining one. Hiller, playing More's wife, creates a character whose pride and strength diminishes when her husband is punished, revealing what we least expected: love.
Also, the film is beautifully shot. Its scenery is nice, but how the camera captures it is better. The set direction and costumes are also very impressive, making the film as much a wonder to look at, as it is to watch. And notice how as the movie progresses and More's situation becomes more and more hopeless the tones become muddier; there are more grays and browns than the reds and oranges from early on.
The film won the 1966 Academy Award for Best Picture. I liked `The Sand Pebbles' a little more, but it was still a deserved win in my book. A great picture, made better by Scofield's powerful performance, 8/10.