IMDb >
Dr. No (1962)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsDr. No (1962) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 92 | slideshow) |
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
8 May 1963 (USA) moreTagline:
NOW meet the most extraordinary gentleman spy in all fiction!...JAMES BOND, Agent 007! morePlot:
James Bond's investigation of a missing colleague in Jamaica leads him to the island of the mysterious Dr. No and a scheme to end the US space program. full summary | full synopsisAwards:
Won Golden Globe. Another 2 wins moreNewsDesk:
(47 articles)
Daniel Craig's 007 inspires ice lolly (From BoxWish. 2 June 2009, 2:56 AM, PDT)
Maxim's SciFi Goddess list: James Bond isn't Sci-Fi, Dorkwad
(From pretty-scary. 4 May 2009, 4:49 PM, PDT)
User Comments:
Simple but one of the best Bond movies ever! moreCast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Sean Connery | ... | James Bond | |
| Ursula Andress | ... | Honey Ryder | |
| Joseph Wiseman | ... | Dr. No | |
| Jack Lord | ... | Felix Leiter | |
| Bernard Lee | ... | M. | |
| Anthony Dawson | ... | Professor R. J. Dent | |
| Zena Marshall | ... | Miss Taro | |
| John Kitzmiller | ... | Quarrel | |
| Eunice Gayson | ... | Sylvia Trench | |
| Lois Maxwell | ... | Miss Moneypenny | |
| Peter Burton | ... | Maj. Boothroyd | |
| Yvonne Shima | ... | Sister Lily | |
| Michel Mok | ... | Sister Rose | |
| Marguerite LeWars | ... | Annabelle Chung - Photographer (also as Marguerite Le Wars) (as Marguerite Lewars) | |
| William Foster-Davis | ... | Superintendent (also as Wm. Foster-Davis) |
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
View content advisory for parentsRuntime:
110 minCountry:
UKLanguage:
EnglishColor:
Color (Technicolor)Aspect Ratio:
1.37 : 1 moreSound Mix:
Mono (Westrex Recording System)Certification:
Canada:PG (Manitoba/Ontario) | Iceland:12 | Canada:13+ (Quebec) | Canada:A (Nova Scotia) | Norway:12 (re-rating) (1979) | Singapore:PG | West Germany:16 (nf) | South Korea:15 | Brazil:12 | Portugal:M/12 | Argentina:13 | Australia:PG | Finland:K-15 (re-rating) | Ireland:PG | Norway:15 (re-rating) | Norway:16 (original rating) | Peru:14 | Sweden:15 | UK:PG | USA:Approved (original rating) | USA:GP (re-rating) (1971) | USA:PG (re-rating) (1994) | UK:A (original rating) (cut)Fun Stuff
Trivia:
The brand of silencer on James Bond's Walther PPK gun was a Brausch. moreGoofs:
Continuity: The hearse used by the Three Blind Mice When they shoot Strangways' secretary and to chase Bond on his way to Miss Taro's house is a LaSalle (circa 1939), which is also used in the rear-projection shots for the car chase. The vehicle which goes over the cliff, however, is a British Humber or a Packard (circa 1941). You can tell them apart easily as the Humber/Packard (the hearse that goes over the cliff) has headlamps at the extremities of its wings, while the LaSalle's headlights are mounted much closer to the radiator grille/hood. moreQuotes:
[first lines]John Strangways: That's it. Hundred honors and ninety below.
Professor R. J. Dent: Nicely done, Strangways. I have to give it to you.
John Strangways: I must leave you for a few minutes. Order a round on my chit, will you Professor.
Professor R. J. Dent: Right.
Gen. Potter: Damn it all! Must you break off at this time every evening?
John Strangways: Sorry, General. My managing director is a creature of habit. There's a call booked through to me every day about this time.
more
Soundtrack:
James Bond Theme moreFAQ
How much sex, violence, and profanity are in this movie?Was Dr. No supposed to be Chinese?
What is the very first glimpse we have of Sean Connery as James Bond?
more
more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Dr. No (1962) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Goldfinger | Thunderball | GoldenEye | From Russia with Love | On Her Majesty's Secret Service |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Action section | IMDb UK section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |












The James Bond franchise has so many films in its library, so many that one can get confused as to which film to watch, which story to pay attention to and which star to be seen.
And with the current trend of making action films (big budget special effects and tons of action) today, mystery, suspense and character-driven plots have all suffered badly in the 007 franchise.
As for the original Bond movie Dr. No, I can start by saying that its simplicity as well as Sean Connery make it one of the BEST BOND FLICKS ever! Why do I like Dr. No better than most other Bond flicks?: 1) There is no overload of explosions or special effects or action scenes. These elements never overwhelm the story telling.
2) The story is simple yet more detailed and more enjoyable to watch than that of other flicks like Man With The Golden Gun, Tomorrow Never Dies and Licence to Kill. In addition, Dr. No's story can be taken seriously.
3) Story is character-driven and the use of mystery and suspense is VERY refreshing after watching too many explosions and special effects happen on screen (Die Another Day anyone?).
4) Sean Connery's performance is no less amazing and his use of charm, coolness and cruelty truly defined James Bond. No matter how hard others tried, Connery will always be the king of Bonds.
5) Ursulla Andress, similar to Connery, is STILL the queen of all Bond Girls not only because of her hot look but also of her excellent portrayal of Honey Rider. On screen, Ursulla has both the appeal of a fighting lady, the helplessness of damsels and the beauty that satisfies viewers. If Bond were to marry again, Honey is number 1 for him.
6) Director Terence Young succeeded in keeping the pace right (mostly moving in medium-pace) which effectively balanced the presentation and prevented it from boring or exciting the viewer too much.. There are lots of details to pay attention to plus the characters are very well told.
7) Dr. No is definitely one of the best Bond villains, probably the best. Joseph Wiseman's performance as the half-German/half-Chinese villain is great to watch and like Connery he had coolness and cruelty on screen note how cool Dr. No was when he resisted Bond's attempt to provoke him. To check things carefully, Bond and Dr. No are essentially as bad as each other. One works to kill and destroy like the other. The makeup work on Wiseman is excellently convincing. Performance-wise, Wiseman's Dr. No is better and more appealing than that of villains Gustav Graves, Stromberg, Largo and others.
8) Dr. No's production values, despite the movie's age, still stands up well until now. The interior sets are very well designed (Dr. No's chamber where Bond and Honey had dinner with him plus Bond's Jamaica hotel room) and has mostly good props (some props look dated though).
Dr. No is worth viewing not only as a classic spy movie but also as a historical art piece of motion pictures! No matter what nay-sayers say, Dr. No will always be the model Bond flick for all sequels to be compared with.
And let us not forget that 007 creator Ian Fleming himself was greatly involved with this movie's production. Dr. No has a plot that can be told clearly, be taken seriously and enjoyed from start to finish. And it has a cast of characters greatly delivered by the actors. Many other Bond films failed when compared to Dr. No on these categories.
Highly recommended viewing!