The River (1951)

User Rating:

7.7/10   

Director:

Jean Renoir

Writers:

Rumer Godden (novel)
Rumer Godden (screenplay) ...

Release Date:

19 December 1951 (France)

Genre:

Drama | Romance

Tagline:

Beauty...Mystery...Delightful Humor...

Plot:

Three adolescent girls growing up in Bengal, India, learn their lessons in life after falling for an older American soldier.

Plot Keywords:

River | India | Teenage Girl | Marriage | Sister Sister Relationship

Awards:

Nominated for 2 BAFTA Film Awards. Another 1 win & 1 nomination

Cast

Nora Swinburne	...	The Mother
Esmond Knight	...	The Father
Arthur Shields	...	Mr. John
Suprova Mukerjee	...	Nan
Thomas E. Breen	...	Capt. John
Patricia Walters	...	Harriet
Radha	...	Melanie
Adrienne Corri	...	Valerie
June Hillman	...	Narration (voice)

Also Known As:

Le fleuve (France)

Runtime:

99 min

Country:

France | India | USA

Language:

English | Bengali

Color:

Color (Technicolor)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1

Sound Mix:

Mono (Western Electric Sound System)

Certification:

UK:U | USA:Approved | Australia:G | Finland:S | Sweden:Btl

Filming Locations:

West Bengal, India

Company:

Oriental International Films

Trivia:

Shot in Technicolor, it was necessary to use brighter lights than usual. This also required spending five months in the lab, painting up colors that weren't rich enough.

Goofs:

Continuity: The position of Captain John's hand changes when he is on the ground (at 00:59:11).

Quotes:

Harriet: Who's important to you, Captain John?
Capt. John: Everybody.

Movie Connections:

References The River (1938)

A great film

It's difficult to argue with Gabridl's remarks about the film - and I'm sure Renoir would have pleaded guilty as charged. Of not making a civics lesson. So, if that's what you want out of art, then this is not the film for you. At all. You will learn nothing of Indian politics, the "exoticism" will drive you mad, and you'd do better to go back and re-read Said's "Orientalism," as Gabridl suggests.

Renoir went to India, and made a film from the perspective of an entranced outsider looking in, creating his own, personalized world - not India, but Renoir's world, where everything is transitory, including beauty and death, and where every sight and sound becomes that much more precious.

I am glad that we have come so far since I've been a kid, when so many ideas and prejudices carried over from the colonial era were still floating through the air, and it's true that no one except that most naive among us would make a film like THE RIVER today. But Renoir was alive in 1950, not now, and he made his film for his time, and that time attaches itself to the film, just like it does to every artwork. I doubt that even Gabridl would suggest that it was the work of a craven exploiter of the masses, and that its "faults" are not the faults of a corrupt man, but of a generous and compassionate one. It's one of the most generous films I know of.

Finally, I would add that while this is a film made by a westerner for other westerners, it was certainly inspirational to Satyajit Ray, who worked as Renoir's assistant.