IMDb >
The Sign of the Cross (1932)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at
blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
blockbuster.com
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsThe Sign of the Cross (1932) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 10 | slideshow) |
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
10 February 1933 (USA) moreTagline:
A picture which will proudly lead all the entertainments the world has ever seenPlot:
After burning Rome, Emperor Nero decides to blame the Christians, and issues the edict that they are all to be caught and sent to the arena... more | add synopsisAwards:
Nominated for Oscar. moreUser Comments:
Great film! Sex and blood and ancient Rome. moreCast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Fredric March | ... | Marcus Superbus | |
| Elissa Landi | ... | Mercia | |
| Claudette Colbert | ... | Empress Poppaea | |
| Charles Laughton | ... | Emperor Nero | |
| Ian Keith | ... | Tigellinus | |
| Arthur Hohl | ... | Titus | |
| Harry Beresford | ... | Favius | |
| Tommy Conlon | ... | Stephan | |
| Ferdinand Gottschalk | ... | Glabrio | |
| Vivian Tobin | ... | Dacia | |
| William V. Mong | ... | Licinius | |
| Joyzelle Joyner | ... | Ancaria (as Joyzelle) | |
| Richard Alexander | ... | Viturius | |
| Nat Pendleton | ... | Strabo | |
| Clarence Burton | ... | Servillius |
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsRuntime:
122 min (without intermission)Country:
USALanguage:
EnglishColor:
Black and WhiteAspect Ratio:
1.37 : 1 moreSound Mix:
Mono (Western Electric Noiseless Recording)Certification:
West Germany:16 (f) | Norway:16 (1947) | USA:Approved (PCA #1581-R, 23 September 1935 for re-release) | USA:Passed (National Board of Review)Fun Stuff
Trivia:
Cecil B. DeMille was pressured to drop Ancaria's seductive dance in the orgy scene by Will H. Hays of the Hays Office, but De Mille adamantly refused. Still, censors often cut out gruesome parts of the film, particularly, the cart carrying dead bodies out of the arena, a gorilla dancing around a semi-nude girl, elephants stomping Christians and picking them up with their tusks, crocodiles about to eat a bound girl, etc. These scenes are all in the restored version. moreGoofs:
Boom mic visible: As the Christians are holding their clandestine meeting at the Grove, right before the little girl asks her mother "Why don't they sing loud?", the shadow of the boom mic can be seen hovering over the people in the background. moreQuotes:
[the Empress, soaking naked in a tub of ass's milk and calling to her handmaiden]Poppaea: Dacia, you're a butterfly with the sting of a wasp. Take off your clothes. Get in here and tell me all about it.
more
Soundtrack:
Ancaria's Song and Dance (The Naked Moon) moreFAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for The Sign of the Cross (1932)| Recent Posts (updated daily) | User |
|---|---|
| Three truely Roman women in THE SIGN OF THE CROSS | marcin_kukuczka |
| Talk about your Roman nose | jshaffer-1 |
Recommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| Quo Vadis | Ben-Hur | Andrey Rublyov | The Crusades | Spartacus |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| IMDb Drama section | IMDb USA section | Add this title to MyMovies |











If all you know about Cecil B. DeMille is the great, but hokey "Ten Commandments." then do yourself a favor and rent "Sign of the Cross." This is a pre-code film, meaning that it has sex, violence, cynicism -- all the stuff that the prigs who invented Hollywood's idiotic morality code couldn't stand. In other words, you may be surprised by how close to modern films this film is. For example, there are some scenes that could easily come out of a David Lynch film. Before getting to all that, though, the film has wonderful acting, incredible sets, witty (great, actually) dialogue, and an intelligent plot. It's not a schmaltzy religious film, but instead offers a serious look at the perils faced by early Christians in Rome, circa A.D. 64, when being a Christian was considered radical and subversive enough to warrant being arrested, tortured, and executed.
Claudette Colbert and Charles Laughton were simply amazing. I have to say that after seeing this film, I'm tempted to sell all of my belongings, including my house, and invest it all in inventing a time machine, just so I can go back to 1930 and try to get Claudette Colbert in the sack. She is incredibly sexy in this movie; just check her out taking a milk bath, or trying to seduce Fredric March, and you'll see what I mean. The woman steals the show -- almost, and that's because Charles Laughton gives a thoroughly brilliant, thoroughly sleazy performance as the insane Emperor Nero. Laughton could act circles around just about anyone; the guy was a genius.
The only weakness of this film, in my humble opinion, was the casting of Fredric March as Marcus. Sure, the guy was a good actor and handsome, but in this film he seemed to be stuck in his silent film days. His expressions and gestures were exaggerated, and even his make-up was overdone (bottom eyeliner, for example). Also, his voice and accent seemed ludicrously inappropriate for ancient Rome. Fortunately, if you as a viewer can get over all that, the guy did give an otherwise fine performance.
Aside from the heavy sexual mood and partial nudity in certain scenes, what's also surprising about this movie is the fairly extreme violence. Though the gore factor was light (by today's standards), the film is replete with stabbings, arrow shots, and torture. The infamous atrocities of the Roman Colliseum are vividly portrayed here, and the cruelty to both people and animals is shocking. Nearly naked women are subjected to some pretty terrible ordeals, including one, which I won't give away, that is simultaneously absurd and very disturbing. And of course, there are those subversive Christians and hungry lions...
I highly recommend this film. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go work on my time machine.