Schastye (1934)

User Rating:

7.7/10   

Director:

Aleksandr Medvedkin

Writer:

Aleksandr Medvedkin (writer)

Release Date:

7 April 1935 (USA)

Genre:

Comedy | Drama

Plot:

A hapless loser (with the surname of Loser) undergoes misadventures with avaracious clergy, a tired horse...

Plot Keywords:

Tractor | Searching For Happiness | Thief | Greed | Vodka

Cast

Pyotr Zinovyev	...	Khmyr'
Yelena Yegorova	...	Anna, his wife
rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Nikolai Cherkasov
Mikhail Gipsi	...	Taras Platonovich
Viktor Kulakov
V. Lavrentyev
G. Mirgorian
Lidiya Nenasheva	...	Nun
V. Uspensky

Directed by
Aleksandr Medvedkin

Writing credits (in alphabetical order)
Aleksandr Medvedkin		writer

Cinematography by
Gleb Troyanski		(as G. Troyansky)

Production Design by
Aleksei Utkin		(as Aleksandr Utkin)

Production Companies

• Vostokfilm

Distributors

• New Yorker Films (1973) (USA) (theatrical) (re-release)
• Amkino Corporation (USA) (English intertitles)

Also Known As:

яВЮЯРЭЕ (Soviet Union: Russian title)
Happiness (USA)
Styazhateli

Runtime:

95 min

Country:

Soviet Union

Color:

Black and White

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1

Sound Mix:

Silent

Certification:

Finland:K-8

Company:

Vostokfilm

Movie Connections:

Featured in Le train en marche (1971)

Party ideology? Artistic and ethic creed? Both?...it's great, to say the least!

Medvedkin may not be on a par with Eisenstein in terms of importance in cinema history, but he was definitely one of the great Soviet pioneers with many great ideas. If you want to know him better I recommend a great Chris Marker documentary from 1992 called Le Tombeau d'Alexandre, a movie that contains a great deal of actual footage of Medbedkin talking about his cinema days. Medvedkin's career as a director is connected with his affiliation with the Communist Party, Schastye itself is a propaganda movie that advertises the benefits of the kolhoz. This was the Russian name for collective farming,the Soviets had this great idea (that obviously backfired) that if industry has greater productivity due to a collective effort, this has to work in agriculture as well. It didn't, but in 1932 when the movie was produced nobody anticipated that. Medvedkin, and Soviet movie-maker generally, had a very clear idea about the new "developments" introduced by the Party but they were actually convinced they were for the best. Given the fact that Communism was not even introduced at the moment in many of the Eastrern countries of Europe, and given the fact that many left-wing intellectuals in Western Europe were convinced the Russians were doing O.K in the 60's and 70's, I think that early Soviet cinema should be looked at with an open mind and dissociated from the actions of the Party (and the killings, and the forced labor etc. ) even if one cannot dissociate It from the Party ideology. Schastye is, from every cinema angle you look at it, a gem. The direction, editing, acting, set-design etc. are simply great. It's interesting to watch it and compare it to the comedies of Chaplin or Keaton that were popular at the time. There are some common elements between them (some of the "objective surrealism" identified by Breton in Keaton's movies is present here). The story is coherent and engaging. Most of the comedy is deeper than anything in Keaton, toughing social issues such as the clergy's hypocrisy, the dependence of the state on the peasants the exploitation of the women in Russian society and so on. I found some connections with much later movies from Bunuel for example. Animation is also used to emphasize the wealthy who are so well of that food jumps in their mouth by itself. Overall a great experience, fun to watch and historically interesting on so many levels.