In January 2003 I picked up a DVD copy (Region 1, thankfully) of the
original 1998 Japanese film RINGU at Kim's Video on St. Mark's Place in
Manhattan. When I found it, I felt like a kid who had just discovered a
secret stash of fireworks or skin mags- I couldn't wait to get home
to brag about it to my geek friends. This was a few months after the
Gore Verbinski-directed American remake had hit the theaters, and I
couldn't wait to take the Greyhound back home to my double-wide out
here in Bush country to pop it into my player. I was convinced that the
Japanese version would hold horrors and wonders barely hinted at in the
chrome-plated, buffed and lacquered American version. Weren't originals
by definition better than the inevitably inferior remakes?
Here's the thing: I liked Verbinski's version better. Had I seen the
original film first- ideally in a packed Tokyo theater full of
screaming Japanese teenagers- I might have felt differently. But
Verbinski's THE RING, while possessed of a plot with all the
consistency of warm Neufchatel, really cooked. In spots it achieved
near masterful levels of tension, and that damned video actually was
creepy.
Verbinski's remake hewed fairly closely to the original's template.
Hideo Nakata's RINGU, however, was both duller and more peculiar than
its sibling. Screenwriter Ehren Kruger wisely chose to punt such hokum
as the spunky reporter's telepathic abilities in favor of more pages
devoted to the soggy ghost Samara, who had the potential to join Freddy
and Jason in the pantheon of great horror movie villains.
THE RING 2, I'm sorry to report, comes nowhere close to the thrills and
chills of the 2002 remake. Watching a double bill of THE RINGS 1 and 2
is the cinematic equivalent of driving eastward through the Rocky
Mountains and into Kansas. You spend the first half of the trip dazzled
by the miraculous scenery, knocked out by the breathtaking peaks and
the spectacular valleys- and then spend the second half of the trip
slapping yourself to stay awake through the hundreds of miles of
flat-lined prairie, with nothing to occupy your interest but the
occasional grain silo, combine or cow. If you're lucky, you might get
to pull off at an exit to snap a picture of the world's second-largest
ball of twine.
So much for the extended metaphors. In THE RING 2, Naomi Watts returns
as spunky reporter Rachel Keller, who has fled Samara and the horrors
of post-grunge Seattle for the friendlier confines of Astoria, Oregon,
where she hooks up with the local rag and presumably starts filing
political exposes to appear next to the high school basketball scores.
Also returning is her gloomy son Aidan (David Dorfman), who sees dead
people, and who now looks like Charles Grodin's Mini-Me. Like the first
film, THE RING 2 opens with a prologue involving another couple of
teenagers encountering that fateful and anachronistic videotape- I
don't even know anyone who still owns a video cassette player, but
everyone in these movies owns at least two.
Rachel gets wind of the eerily familiar story and leaves behind her
befuddled editor Max (Simon Baker) to investigate. Soon enough, she
detects the mildewed stench of Samara, the undead video-bound little
girl who extracts soul-sucking revenge on all who don't pass on her
tragic back-story by making another poor victim watch the dreaded
videotape. But Samara may have found a new way to enter our world-
and her fate may now be bound up inextricably with the fate of Rachel's
son.
Here's the thing: it was a mistake to bring back Naomi Watts for the
sequel, her contractual obligation notwithstanding. Watts is a fine
actress, you understand. She acquits herself admirably, and I'm sure
everyone involved was happy to have her around. But by centering the
sequel on Rachel and Aidan, you immediately lose the core idea that
made THE RING such an effective horror film- the videotape as an evil
virus, replicating and spreading from victim to victim, only sparing
those who willingly infect others. That's a kick-ass, subtext-laden
concept that could easily sustain enough sequels to get us through the
rest of the decade.
But Ehren Kruger, returning for his screenwriting encore, abandons this
concept utterly. He's refashioned the Rachel-Aidan-Samara triangle as a
garden-variety possession tale, and more's the pity. Without the killer
hook, we're left with only the least successful aspects of the
original- the nonsensical plot, the fractured internal logic, the
male sidekick with the target on his back, and the so-called terrible
revelations that don't amount to a hill of beans. The script does
introduce a compelling child-abuse subplot with loads of potential, but
then doesn't have the stones to see it through.
And let's face it- though it was a noble idea to bring on RINGU
director Nakata to helm the sequel, he's no Gore Verbinski. Verbinski
turned the potential train wreck of PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN into a hit
film, plays guitar in a punk band and created the Budweiser frogs, for
crying out loud. There's precious little tension in Nakata's film. A
nonsensical attack by a herd of angry deer stands out as the big set
piece, and the climax manages a few modest thrills. But mostly it's
just a drag. The movie is rife with intriguing cameos by such heavy
hitters as Sissy Spacek, Gary "Lumbergh" Cole and Elizabeth Perkins,
but they're merely shuffled on set, told to hit their marks and say
their lines, and then quickly shuffled off again. In the theater, the
original left you exhilarated; the sequel leaves you yawning into your
empty popcorn bag.
Here's some free advice, Mr. Kruger, if you're reading. Assuming
that THE RING 2 does enough business in box office and DVD rentals to
spawn a third movie, return the series to its roots with a new cast and
build the plot around the accursed videotape and Samara's hellish
need for attention. And for the love of God, enough with the PG-13
horror movies already. What we need is the return of the good
old-fashioned R-rated horror film. Let's see some blood. Let's see
some tits. Let's see some really scary shit. The teenagers will still
turn out; they always do. There are plenty of foreign and cult splatter
films stacked on the shelves of Kim's Video, all crying out for
splashy remakes. You have only to spend a few hours browsing the racks
there to find suitable inspiration.
***
Visit Poor Richard's Film Almanac at http://www.filmreviewblog.com
========== X-RAMR-ID: 39687 X-Language: en X-RT-ReviewID: 1382834 X-RT-TitleID: 1143245 X-RT-AuthorID: 1230
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews