Melinda and Melinda (2004)

reviewed by
Mark R. Leeper


                       MELINDA AND MELINDA
                (a film review by Mark R. Leeper)
     CAPSULE: Woody Allen shows us how the same
     inspiration can inspire either a comedy or a
     tragic love story.  We see the creative process
     at work as a comedy director creates a comic
     story and a more serious director takes the
     original story in the direction of tragedy.
     The only trouble is that occasionally we cannot
     tell which is the comic and which is the tragic

story and neither story is particularly engaging.

     This is more an interesting idea for a film than
     an interesting film.  Rating: low +1 (-4 to +4)
     or 5/10

More so than with any other director, when Woody Allen makes a

new film I feel compelled to put the new film on the curve of

Allen's career and see how this film stacks up against his recent

films. That is because after CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS Allen seems

to have stopped making films for his audiences. Certainly his

films have been much less audience pleasers. Most people I know

have at least one film they like from this last period, but there

is no consensus that any of his films have been good. I

moderately enjoyed BULLETS OVER BROADWAY and ANYTHING ELSE. But

Allen's films are no longer reliably good and some have been

quite bad. MELINDA AND MELINDA is being acclaimed as Allen's

return to greatness, but I just do not see greatness in this

film.

The concept is the best thing about MELINDA AND MELINDA. Two

successful film directors are having dinner at a fancy restaurant

with some of their friends. Sy (played by Wallace Shawn) is

known for his bright comedies. Max (Larry Pine) makes films that

are tragic looks at life. A friend tells a story that we do not

hear. Each of the directors tells what he would do if he were

adapting this story as a film. We see the two stories play out

using elements from the unheard story in different ways. Each

story tells of how Melinda (Radha Mitchell) arrives unexpectedly

from out of town to visit her friend. The two sub-films have

different characters and tell nearly different stories, though

each has Melinda as a character, and in each Mitchell plays her.

Each tells how she is the catalyst to ruin the relationship of

her friend, her friend's husband, and two of their friends. The

relationships do go wrong, but so does the film because each of

the stories is not engaging and fails to make us care for the

characters.

We are distanced from the characters because the two filmmakers,

who obviously represent two sides of Allen's personality, use

much the same style for their films. Speaking for myself it is

not a style that works well. Part of the problem is that most of

the action of the film is not shown to us but we are told.  The

sex scenes we do get to see, but most of the rest of the scenes

consist of characters getting together and discussing what is

happening in their lives. The film tells us far too much and

shows us far too little. And because we do not see much of the

characters in action, we do not know who they are. And not

knowing who they are we do not care much about what happens to

them. And when Allen fails to involve us in the characters we do

not really who ends up bedding whom. It all seems like gossip

about people we do not know. Ironically, the film shows us a

small piece of Edgar Ulmer's THE BLACK CAT. This is a film in

which the major action took place years before and there are

plenty of scenes of talking about the past. But the interest

never flags because there is plenty of action in the present,

unlike in MELINDA AND MELINDA. As an aside, I think THE BLACK

CAT is an under-appreciated gem of delightfully morbid black

comedy. It may be the best film of Universal's creative period

from 1930 to 1935.

Woody Allen's screen personality always seems to be present in

his films even if he himself is only behind the camera. Here the

Woody Allen figure is Hobie (Will Ferrell) who in spite of very

different physical stature has the Allen patented personality and

mannerisms. Some of the other characters do not seem human at

all.  Who do you know who would say "Life has a funny way of

dealing with great potential" or "My sad tale should come from my

lips"? That is another reason it is hard to get into these

characters' lives and care who is getting into each other's beds.

For my money this is another Allen misfire. I rate it a low +1

on the -4 to +4 scale or 5/10.
                                        Mark R. Leeper
                                        mleeper@optonline.net
                                        Copyright 2005 Mark R. Leeper
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 39681
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1382827
X-RT-TitleID: 1143243
X-RT-SourceID: 1591
X-RT-AuthorID: 1309
X-RT-RatingText: 5/10

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews