Little Nicky (2000)

reviewed by
John Ulmer


LITTLE NICKY (2000)
Rating: 1.5/5 stars

http://www.themovieaddict.com/reviews/little_nicky.html

Review by The Movie Addict (John Ulmer), Copyright, 2004

One word describes Little Nicky: sophomoric. This movie has great (or

at least good) potential as a comedy – but is ruined by a grating lead

performance, poor scriptwriting, and increasingly lame jokes. Worst of

all, however, is the totally inept direction – had the film been

delivered to better talent, it could have easily been Adam Sandler's

best comedy. It's one of his worst, simply because the amateur

handling is similar to that of worse duds like Battlefield Earth.

Sandler's Billy Madison wasn't anything special but at least it was

adequately made.

No faults in the cast. With performances and cameos including Patricia

Arquette, Harvey Keitel, Quentin Tarantino, Rodney Dangerfield, Dana

Carvey, Jon Lovitz, Reese Witherspoon, Henry Winkler, Ozzy Osbourne,

Rob Schneider, Michael McKean, Robert Smigel, Regis Philbin and Carl

Weathers, the film's flaw is its script – the talented actors are

required to mutter extremely contrived dialogue, and most of the time

they do so quite embarrassingly. Watching Keitel is painful – he's not

even trying. You know you're in trouble when a film's best performance

is by Quentin Tarantino – in this case, as a blind preacher who has a

habit of injuring himself (every time we see him it's a new brace,

bandage, etc.).

The plot is basically this: titular character "Little" Nicky (Sandler)

is the son of Lucifer (Keitel), whose other two sons leave hell in

search of fun "up north" in New York City. Their journey magically

breaks the gates of hell, or something, and as a result this causes

the Devil to wither away. Nicky is left as the only possible source of

salvation, having to travel north, bring his evil brothers back and

save his dying father (how does someone in hell die? Don't ask me.).

The movie has a few clever gags for movie buffs – Elephant Man and

Scarface references being the best, if not very subtle. The film's

problem is that it quickly runs out of steam – it's a one-trick pony

and is only able to sustain its screwball antics for so long until it

becomes a chore to sit through.

One thing I have to give credit to Sandler for is that, although his

comedies may not be perfect, most of the time they are somewhat

amusing and aren't as commercially sloppy as Little Nicky. By that, I

mean that this movie is a by-the-numbers Hollywood product – it moves

from Point A to Point B to Point C, introducing all the typical

clichιs of the genre. Sandler's comedies have always been weak in

terms of romantic subplots – the tacked-on relationship in Happy

Gilmore was laughable, and Madison's was even worse. Didn't matter

much because the films relied on jokes. Not here. Jokes are rare. The

romantic subplot is the worst so far in any of his films – I felt

sorry for Arquette, and I was disturbed by how shallow her character

was written. (She meets Nicky – a muttering, mumbling, evil idiot – in

New York, treats him nice, goes out on a date, and then he swears at

her and makes obscene gestures and tells her that he's the spawn of

Satan and she gives a cute smile and goes on a magical Satan-powered

flight across the city with him. Absolutely pathetic.)

Characters are handled as throwaways – Dangerfield's

potentially-hilarious performance is watered down and never given full

opportunity, showing up once and a while to add a few laughs to a flat

sequence. Keitel's performance is weak and Sandler has once again

created a grating voice – Little Nicky sounds just like his geeky

character from SNL who would show up on Weekend Updates to give music

reports. A better comedian might really find a character to play

underneath the surface – Sandler isn't able to because, to be fair, he

isn't much of a comedian. As a result his performance is painfully

blunt – about as subtle as a hammer over the head. Instead of playing

a wacky, annoying person in his next movie, why doesn't he just play

himself? That's what he's always been good at. There's a reason Happy

Gilmore is still his best comedy, and Punch-Drunk Love was so great.

The gratuitous cameos become almost as annoying as the constant

merchandising tie-ins and references (I counted Coca-Cola, Pepsi,

Popeye's Chicken, and the television show Felicity, not to mention the

rock soundtrack that cuts back and forth to one song after another

without using them to any real advantage).

The cameos? That's Chubbs Peterson from Happy Gilmore ("It's all in

the hips!") and Henry Winkler, apparently not reprising his role as

the coach from The Waterboy. Those two were fun enough, but the Rob

Schneider reprisal is lame – having the same character show up time

and time again to say the same thing ("You can do it!") isn't clever

if he's annoying to begin with. The movie is one big Adam Sandler

Celebration – it references Gilmore, Madison, Waterboy, and even lines

from the films (having said "It's all in the hips!" about three

times). Then there's the inclusion of characters from Sandler's music

CDs – mainly Whitey the Coach, who is played by Dana Carvey, and who

was later voiced by Sandler in the animated flop 8 Crazy Nights.

All in all the movie tries to be a number of different things and

becomes absolutely nothing at all. It wants to be a social and

religious satire but is content to stay within the PG-13 guidelines,

so it never becomes as raunchy or funny or downright refreshing as

Dogma. Kevin Smith is a daring director and is capable of extending

the craziest of material into something clever. Steven Brill, the

director of Little Nicky, is considerably less talented and as a

result his movie – which similarly moves towards an apocalyptic ending

a la Dogma – becomes a complete and under mess, totally predictable

and stupid.

Little Nicky is a big disappointment.

- John Ulmer
http://www.themovieaddict.com

e-mail: webmaster@themovieaddict.com

==========
X-RAMR-ID: 38744
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1324622
X-RT-TitleID: 1101377
X-RT-SourceID: 1382
X-RT-AuthorID: 6769
X-RT-RatingText: 1.5/5

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews