Devil's Advocate, The (1997)

reviewed by
John Ulmer


THE DEVIL'S ADVOCATE (1997)
2.5/5 stars
Review by John Ulmer

"The Devil's Advocate" works as neither a supernatural thriller nor a

courtroom drama – instead it relies heavily upon excessive content and

performances, silly over-the-top concepts and a genuinely unpleasing

conclusion, all of which stain an otherwise fairy enjoyable modern-day

parable.

The movie rambles on far too long about nothing in particular, always

thinking it's much cleverer than it actually is. For example, the

identity of a mysterious tycoon in New York City, named John Milton

(hint-hint), isn't revealed until about 2/3 of the way through the

film – despite the fact that the title of the movie, and all the

events therein leading up to this "revelation," basically give away

the "secret" from the start. So why in the world didn't anyone realize

this during production? Did anyone stop and say, "I wonder if people

will be smart enough to guess who he really is before we expect them

to…?"

If you don't want to know who Milton is, don't read any further.

However, if you have an IQ past that of the guy from Sling Blade,

you'll probably already realize that John Milton (played by Al Pacino)

is the Devil. Lucifer. Satan. "I have so many names," he says to

hotshot lawyer Keanu Reeves.

The story is routine at best – Milton hires the Aspiring Young Lawyer

from Hicksville, U.S.A. to travel to the Big Apple and take on

Important Cases. Soon the Lawyer's Wife (Charlize Theron) turns into

the Crazy Character That No One Believes, because she thinks Milton is

the devil, and they all laugh at her, and her husband laughs at her.

Hmm…maybe everyone on set was consuming laughing gas – this would

explain why the film rarely makes sense and Theron turns in the best

performance in a film starring…Al Pacino? It's almost sad to see him

resorting to more yelling and screaming and over-the-top ranting –

Pacino's big speech about God has potential, but he says it all so

annoyingly that it begins to grate on the nerves. I don't expect

Pacino to play Satan as a calm everyman, but at least he could try and

make a consistent character out of the role – instead of showing up on

set, consuming laughing gas and acting like an idiot. (Forgive me,

because I actually am an enormous fan of Pacino's work – but he simply

stinks here, and there's no excuse for his poor performance.)

"The Devil's Advocate" bears most relation to the supernatural

film-noir hybrid, "Angel Heart," released a decade prior. That film

co-starred Robert De Niro, who handled the role of Satan much better

than Pacino – mainly because although they both acted rather

flamboyantly, De Niro had better control. Ever since "Scent of a

Woman" in 1992, Pacino's over-acting has increased to a point of

near-nausea – is this the same guy who so expertly played Michael

Corleone and Tony Montana?

If you can put up with a movie that is over-the-top and excessive and

puts the work of Brian DePalma to shame, then maybe you'll be able to

stand"The Devil's Advocate." If you can put up with a movie that

wastes the talents of its main performers and leads nowhere but into

an unsatisfying apocalyptic massacre of an ending, you might even

enjoy this.

But if you can put up with a movie that proposes Keanu Reeves is a

genius lawyer who's "never lost a single case," you deserve to die a

very painful death. Please go far away and never return.

Just kidding. But seriously – Keanu Reeves? Tom Green has a better

chance…
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 38616
X-RT-ReviewID: 1319357
X-RT-TitleID: 1079441
X-RT-SourceID: 1382
X-RT-AuthorID: 6769
X-RT-RatingText: 2.5/5

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews