Village, The (2004)

reviewed by
Karina Montgomery


The Village
Matinee Price

One thing I always find rewarding about M. Night

Shyamalan's films is that they bear up well under

analysis. They invite discussion at the depths

of an art film, but with the accessibility of a

big Hollywood film. While none of his films

since have matched The Sixth Sense for pure

clarity and craft, The Village takes a moderately

high concept and sells it effectively as an

intimate thriller.

In discussions, I found some folks missed key

connections that others had found obvious, and

the affection level for the film appears to

follow this curve precisely. This affection

hinges on the perception of the film underneath

the plot.  If you take all the clues and spread 

them out on a table, very little in this film

defies explanation. I found it delicious to go

back and revisit scenes in my mind with

information obtained later in the film. "oh, so

he's got Š" and "I see, the thing there I forŠ" 

Et cetera. One scene, with claustrophobically

close camera work,gained momentum even more so

after it was over; this same scene elicited gasps

of reaction from the audience which exceeded any

reaction at all from audiences in Troy.

Bryce Dallas Howard is given short shrift in the

previews because, for my money, this is her

movie. Joaquin Phoenix is supposedly the name to

draw the young folks in, and smart-movie

stalwarts Sigourney Weaver and William Hurt are

strong foundations, but Ron's daughter Bryce is

simply fabulous. The rest of the idyllic Village

residents fade behind her steely and vulnerable

beauty, happy to remain ruled (and protected) by

fear. Fear and faith. The younger generation

(Howard, Joaquin Phoenix, Adrien Brody) have

faith in the protection afforded them by the

village's boundaries, but the mythology that

gives the boundary power is entirely grounded in

fear.  As outsiders, we can see that it is 

mythology, artificial symbols protecting from an

unseen danger; it's in every culture, modern and

primitive, as is the very thing these people hope

to escape.

Yet the titular habitation appears designed to

eliminate terror. Watchtowers, lit peripheries,

systems and drills and safety measures, which

only serve to remind one of the eve-present

danger. Sound familiar? Of course, their terror

level is perpetually at yellow, but they are a

simpler folk. The simplicity of their homespun

lives, their slow, deliberate movements and

speech, everything feels safe and solid. Yet,

superstition and un-nameable bogeys (not unlike

the You-Know-Who moniker of Harry Potter's

Voldemort gaining power by being unspeakable)

dictate every aspect of these people's lives.

Joaquin Phoenix is fine in his role. I have

never warmed to him as a performer, but I believe

that he believes in what his role is 

experiencing, and that is enough; Howard takes me

the rest of the way. Adrien Brody exhibits a

gentle genius as the mentally disabled Noah,

whose disease is more alien to his peers than

even they know.

Director of photography Roger Deakins has the

most sensitive eye in the business, with subtle,

delicate shifts in light and color forming the

most powerful images. An outstretched hand in

the darkness, indistinct forms looming beyond in

shadow, it gives me chills. Shyamalan's

requisite cameo and sole reaction shot will be

lost on video. Deakins' painting with light

deserves big screen viewing.

Ever-Shymalan collaborator James Newton Howard's

score to the Village is equally as lovely and

delicate as Deakins' imagery. It matches the

peaches and cream complexion of Howard's Ivy and

the complexity of the mid-film dilemma. A great

score in theory should never be noticed, but I

found myself straining to hear it nonetheless.

Shyamalan has sort of trapped himself with The

Sixth Sense and Unbreakable and Signs (to a

degree; that revelation was more the completion

of a circle), creating an audience expectation of

a Big Twist.  I am sure Night did not set out to 

be a cinematic O. Henry, and what some might call

the "obligatory surprise" in The Village is what

I would only call a new level.  This film is 

about faith and fear and balancing those to have

a whole life. Some information must be withheld

from the audience to build empathy with a

character, but the fascinating story underneath

is only grazed by the script.

If you have not yet seen The Village, don't

listen to the people around you - everyone seems

to get something different from this film. (They

used to call that "art.") In my experience, even

having had an impression of what ended up being a

revelation, the mystery of the village unfolds in

such a way that it rewards the careful viewer.

For one who suspends her disbelief as willingly

as I do, The Village was a treat even when I 
spoiled it for myself.
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

These reviews (c) 2004 Karina Montgomery. Please

feel free to forward but credit the reviewer in

the text.  Thanks.    You can check out previous 
reviews at:
http://www.cinerina.com   and 

http://ofcs.rottentomatoes.com - the Online Film

Critics Society

http://www.hsbr.net/reviews/karina/listing.hsbr -

Hollywood Stock Exchange Brokerage Resource

==========
X-RAMR-ID: 38504
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1305448
X-RT-TitleID: 1134441
X-RT-SourceID: 755
X-RT-AuthorID: 3661
X-RT-RatingText: 4/5

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews