Metallica: Some Kind of Monster (2004)

reviewed by
David N. Butterworth


METALLICA: SOME KIND OF MONSTER
A film review by David N. Butterworth
Copyright 2004 David N. Butterworth
*** (out of ****)

When I first heard about "Metallica: Some Kind of Monster" I thought it

was a joke. Or at least a follow-up to "This is Spinal Tap." "As the multi-million

dollar-selling rock band Metallica commence work on their latest album, accompanied

by a $40,000/month psychiatrist to help them exorcise some of their personal

demons (relations between band members being at an all-time low), they take

documentary filmmakers Bruce Berlinger and Joe Sinofsky ("Brother's Keeper")

along for the ride in an attempt to document the whole, angst-ridden experience

for themselves, and for their multitudinous heavy metal fans."

     It doesn't help that not one but two of said band members bear an uncanny
resemblance to Michael McKean.

The specter (and in a lot of ways the unanticipated spirit) of "'Spinal

Tap" hangs over "Metallica: Some Kind of Monster" like a "huge" rickety Stonehenge

set suspended from the ceiling. All that's missing is the sexy (sorry, sexist)

album cover, the amplifier that goes to eleven, and Nigel Tufnel waxing rhapsodic

about how he thinks he'd make for a good haberdasher. It's hard to get away

from all that while witnessing drummer Lars Ulrich, singer/guitarist James Hetfield,

and lead guitarist Kirk Hammett head-banging their way through jam-style recording

sessions one minute, banging heads in group therapy sessions the next.

Having said all that "Metallica: Some Kind of Monster" isn't a bad film

by any means. In fact it's really quite good--I certainly know more about the

band now than virtually any I'd admit to liking particularly--and as an eye-witness

account of a grossly egotistical rock band struggling to get along, hampered

by dissention, addiction, and a singular lack of inspiration, "Metallica: Some

Kind of Monster" does the job. The creative process is clearly one that is

often fraught with obstacles (Hetfield, for example, took a one-year leave of

absence, checking himself into a rehab clinic with his co-members wondering

if he'd ever return).

But it's more an interesting film than a fascinating one partly because

of its length, partly because of its repetitive structure, and partly because

the insight offered up by the film's subjects, as in Jim Jarmusch's "Year of

the Horse," is less than compelling. And I might have enjoyed the film more

had I connected with the endless guitar riffs and crashing drum solos that weigh

heavily on the non-fan mind.

What's comforting about the film, however, is the knowledge that even an

outfit that can offer their new bassist Robert Trujillo a one million dollar

advance can still have their sucky days. Just ask Bob Rock at the soundboard:

perspective is something that often gets lost in the mix.

Berlinger and Sinofsky's cameras started rolling early in 2001, when the

band rented space in San Francisco's Presidio and started cranking out ideas

for a new album. Two years later "St. Anger" is pretty much in the can, but

the road to that point has been as rocky as a Philadelphia prizefighter. Perhaps

the band simply needs to lighten up a bit--making music should be fun, no?

The next time Ulrich, Hetfield, and Hammett hit a creative impasse (or each

other) might I suggest--and they don't have to pay me Dr. Phil's whopping monthly

salary for the recommendation--that they rent Rob Reiner's film and recognize,

with amusement and foresight, just how lightweight the heavy metal music business

can be.
     That, or become haberdashers.
--
David N. Butterworth
dnb@dca.net
Got beef? Visit "La Movie Boeuf"

online at http://members.dca.net/dnb

==========
X-RAMR-ID: 38480
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1310706
X-RT-TitleID: 1134011
X-RT-SourceID: 878
X-RT-AuthorID: 1393
X-RT-RatingText: 3/4

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews