Rocky II (1979)

reviewed by
John Ulmer


ROCKY II (1979)
4.5/5 stars
Review by John Ulmer

I have to hand it to Sylvester Stallone – he did the impossible with

"Rocky II" and made a successful follow-up to "Rocky," winner of the

1976 Best Picture Academy Award.

Some argue that "Taxi Driver" (also nominated) deserved the Oscar

more. I'm not so sure. "Rocky" came along at just the right time – it

was an uplifting story and people needed that back then. Now, "Taxi

Driver" is usually considered the superior of the two – but they're

entirely different and, in my opinion (and it's a rare one), "Rocky"

is just as good – but in a different way. They're both great films,

and I'm not saying that "Taxi Driver" shouldn't have won – but I'm not

necessarily saying it should have, either. "Rocky's" achievement is

monumental and it is one of the greatest films ever made. To say it's

"not as good" merely because it is more optimistic is nonsense.

So what's so great about "Rocky II" and why is it generally

underrated? (Its average user score right now on the Internet Movie

Database -- with over 8,000 votes -- is a measly 6.2/10, compared to

the original's 7.7)

Because it maintains the focus of the first film, and continues the

story rather well. A story that didn't really need to be continued,

per se, but nevertheless formed the foundation of one of the greatest

film franchises of all time. That's right – many people hate the

"Rocky" sequels, but apart from "Part V," they're all surprisingly

entertaining – and, more importantly, well made. I like them; they

entertain me, and I think they all serve their purpose.

What's particularly interesting about "Rocky II" is that apart from

repeating the central theme of fighting Apollo Creed (Carl Weathers),

Rocky (Stallone) goes through a character arc here that many sequels

totally ignore – we see the after-effects of his fight, and him

struggling to adapt to the "New Life."

Rocky is not a smart person. But he is one of cinema's deepest

characters. Stallone (who wrote all the scripts and directed three of

the sequels) succeeds at evolving Rocky's self-confidence. After

winning a small fortune from his famous fight with Creed, he goes out

on an impulsive shopping spree, buying a cool car, a new leather

jacket (with a tiger – the beast with the "eye" that Rocky re-captures

in "Part III" – printed on the back), and a new luxurious apartment

for him and his wife Adrienne (Talia Shire).

The problem is that Rocky soon runs out of money. His happy-go-lucky

personality crashes when he is faced with the prospect of losing it

all. He promised Adrienne never to fight again, and keeps his word by

trying to get a "real" job at the meat-processing factory (the same

one he trained at in the original film). However due to staff cut

backs he is fired and soon realizes that he was born for one reason:

To fight.

Meanwhile, Apollo is eager to take on "The Italian Stallion" again –

to prove he isn't the coward that criticizers are implying he is. He

entices Rocky back into the ring for a final match – and to say that

the outcome is satisfactory is an understatement.

Most people seem to forget that Stallone is almost solely responsible

for the entire success of "Rocky" as a whole. He came up with the

idea, wrote a script, fought to get it made, fought to become the

leading star, and literally fought to get in shape. All of this

fighting paid off – and it continued to pay off as he kept on cranking

out all the sequels.

Indeed, the "Rocky" legacy is often poked fun at because it is the

typical endless Hollywood moneymaking franchise. But "Rocky II" and

"III" (more so than the other two sequels) have guts, power,

determination and focus – they've got the so-called "Eye of the Tiger"

and I can't really say that I agree with anyone who says these movies

are worthless. They aren't masterpieces but they certainly aren't

trash, either. I give "Rocky II" a hearty recommendation – it's a

truly solid sequel that surprises us right when we expect to be

disappointed.
- John Ulmer
e-mail: johnulmer2003@msn.com
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 38436
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1307192
X-RT-TitleID: 1017777
X-RT-SourceID: 1382
X-RT-AuthorID: 6769
X-RT-RatingText: 4.5/5

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews