Rear Window (1954)

reviewed by
John Ulmer


REAR WINDOW (1954)
5/5 stars
Review by John Ulmer
Copyright, 2004

For most of its duration, not a single shot in Alfred Hitchcock's

"Rear Window" takes place outside the small, lonely apartment of L.B.

Jeffries (James Stewart). Every exterior pan originates through the

eyes of the injured photographer, whose broken leg has him restrained

to a wheelchair, living off of the meals of his caretaker, Stella

(Thelma Ritter).

When his fiancιe, Lisa (Grace Kelly), stands outside the window, we

see her – but we're still in the room. The camera does not position

itself on the sidewalk, or above the flowerbed next to her, or in the

window of another room – it stays put.

What Hitchcock does here is nothing short of brilliant – the movie

turns us into unconscious voyeurs as we are forced to take on the

perspective of the protagonist, and participate in his constant

eavesdropping.

This technique of isolation and confinement forms a sort of disturbing

effect that smothers the viewer on a subconscious level – we can feel

it, but can't necessarily put a finger on what, exactly, it is.

The movie is also particularly risquι for its time – 50 years later

it's the sort of film that would probably receive a PG rating (and, in

fact, after being restored and re-released in 2000, it did). There is

no foul language, no sex, no nudity, no violence (per se), and no drug

content. But there are many insinuations – e.g. the mental image

Hitchcock forms in his viewers' minds, of the man next door murdering

his wife; the innuendo involving Lisa's overnight stay at Jeffries'

(and her dress that sparks the interest of a private detective); the

newlywed couple next door ("No comment," Jeffries tells Lisa); Miss

Torso, the ballerina who lives across the street and the amount of

time Jeffries spends watching her dance and change out of clothes.

Jeffries has injured his leg after trying to take a daring photograph

-- now he doesn't have a television or any other means of

entertainment, so he amuses himself by studying the lives of others.

Sound familiar? With "Reality TV" shows such as "Survivor," "Big

Brother" and "Fear Factor," America's growing fascination with

voyeuristic programming is becoming rather startling. Although the

1987 action picture "The Running Man" (and its source manuscript by

Stephen King) is often credited with accurately depicting this odd

form of entertainment, "Rear Window" – to a certain degree – predicted

it much earlier. 34 years earlier, to be exact.

One night while studying the rooms across the street, Jeffries notices

a strange man carrying a briefcase in and out of a darkened room. The

man's disabled wife (who demands his constant care) is nowhere to be

seen. The next day, she is gone, apparently on a train; but Jeffries

notices Thorvald (Raymond Burr), the mysterious man, cleaning a sharp

knife in the kitchen sink.

Could he have committed murder? Jeffries believes so, and convinces

Lisa and Stella, too. They begin to piece together a number of clues –

a disheveled flower bed, a purse, fake letters – that lead to one

conclusion: Murder. The problem is that no one else believes them.

A movie such as "Rear Window" would never work nowadays. The main

character would entertain himself with technology – not voyeurism. The

windows would not be left open for fear of burglary. Police would be

more willing to believe such a "far-fetched" story, and the private

detective probably wouldn't shrug off Jeffries like he does in the

film.

This is evidenced by the poor remake starring Christopher Reeves, made

for television – it didn't make any sense because it was set in this

day and age, featuring an outdated concept. It almost seemed silly,

and was vastly inferior.

But it works in the 1950s, and as a film, "Rear Window' still holds up

beautifully today – despite its dated premise (or, at least,

execution), the other elements of the story keep it interesting. We

are willing to suspend our disbelief because it is so great. And

because "back then" the story's progression seems more natural than it

ever would today.

The performances are flawless – James Stewart is completely convincing

as Jeffries, a man controlled by his own impulses. Likewise

Hitchcock's typical blonde love interest, Grace Kelly, is marvelous –

beautiful and likable, willing to do anything for Jeffries, which

includes breaking into Thorvald's room while he's out and about (which

results in one of the most nerve-jangling suspense sequences of all

time). And Raymond Burr is utterly petrifying as Thorvald, who is

almost always seen from a distance, with his odd white hair and

continually narrowed eyes that just scream murder.

"Rear Window" is often considered by most critics to be Alfred

Hitchcock's greatest masterpiece. For my money, "Psycho" (1960) is his

best – but "Rear Window" may very well be number two. With a career

comprised of some truly amazing motion pictures ("The 39 Steps," "The

Lady Vanishes," "The Man Who Knew Too Much," "Shadow of a Doubt,"

"Strangers on a Train," "Vertigo," etc.), it will always be hard to

choose Hitchcock's "best" movie – but in terms of narrative, and

filmmaking, and acting, "Rear Window" could justifiably be called one

of his all-time greatest. And, all considered, that's not a compliment

to be taken very lightly.
==========
X-RAMR-ID: 38408
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1303665
X-RT-TitleID: 1017289
X-RT-SourceID: 1382
X-RT-AuthorID: 6769
X-RT-RatingText: 5/5

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews