FAREWELL, MY LOVELY (1975)
A Film Review Copyright Dragan Antulov 2003
Musicals, gangster films and westerns - according to Martin Scorsese, those three genres defined American cinema in 20th Century. Scorsese could have made another addition to the list - film noir. Based on hard-boiled detective novels of 1930s, this genre is usually associated with Hollywood films made one decade later. Through the years film noir, like everything else, evolved and took many forms, but the one usually associated with the term is defined with 1940s Los Angeles settings and private investigator as protagonist. The most responsible for this is the writer who had inspired some of 1940s classics - Raymond Chandler. Popularity of Chandler's work continued to inspired filmmakers in later decades, and one of the films that tried very hard to be faithful adaptation of Chandler's writings is FAREWELL, MY LOVELY, 1975 film directed by Dick Richards.
The script for this film is the second adaptation of Chandler's 1934 novel MURDER, MY SWEET (first being Edward Dmytrik's 1944 classic FAREWELL MY LOVELY). The plot is set in Los Angeles during the early days of Summer 1941. While the world watches German panzers invading Russia and the America watches Joe di Maggio trying to beat baseball records, private investigator Philip Marlowe (played by Robert Mitchum) is forced to take all kinds of humiliating tasks in order to fill his bank account. His next client is someone with whom majority of sensible people would hardly have any business - Moose Malloy (played by Jack O'Halloran), petty criminal of huge and menacing stature. Malloy wants to get in touch with his girlfriend Velma Valent, and Marlowe agrees to help him, not knowing that he would get entangled in the complex web of intrigue, corruption and murder that somehow connects Los Angeles political establishment with its sleazy criminal underworld.
While many modern-day film noirs try to recreate 1940s Los Angeles through production design, costumes or cars, FAREWELL, MY LOVELY goes a little bit further. Events in the film are framed with references to real history and David Zelag Goodman's script, one of the most faithful adaptations of Chandler's texts, doesn't shy away from portraying some ugly realities of the time, usually ignored by Hollywood - mistreatment of blacks and rampant police corruption. But the most visible attempt to capture the 1940s on film happens through John A. Alonzo's excellent photography, inspired by some of classic paintings that captured American urban night life in those times. Most of the film is happening in the night, and the dominant colour is red, thus creating impression of Los Angeles as one great brothel. In such context, even some of the more familiar elements of Chandlerian adaptation - like voiceovers or femme fatales - doesn't look like cliches.
Robert Mitchum was right on the spot as the world's most famous private detective. With his wrinkled face he expressed the world- weariness and cynicism of Philip Marlowe very well; when the role demanded to show some humanity, those scenes were especially poignant. The rest of the cast wasn't that impressive, with exception of Sylvia Miles in the excellent role of washed-up chorus girl. Charlotte Rampling, for all of her efforts to capture on-screen magic of Lauren Bacall, still looks too beautiful for this film. The film also suffers from couple of plot developments that could be best described as "deus ex machina", and one of those scenes even serve rather obvious purpose of delivering some gratuitous female nudity. Yet, despite those flaws, FAREWELL, MY LOVELY, with couple of excellent performances and impressive reconstruction of the period, is a very entertaining film that could be recommended even to those viewers who aren't film noir aficionados.
RATING: 7/10 (+++)
Review written on February 10th 2003
Dragan Antulov a.k.a. Drax http://film.purger.com - Filmske recenzije na hrvatskom/Movie Reviews in Croatian http://www.purger.com/users/drax/reviews.htm - Movie Reviews in English http://www.ofcs.org - Online Film Critics Society
========== X-RAMR-ID: 34073 X-Language: en X-RT-ReviewID: 841400 X-RT-TitleID: 1007110 X-RT-AuthorID: 1307 X-RT-RatingText: 7/10
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews